Council archive · source document
08/0946 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132008.946
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.2, 31 March 2008
ISTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD ]
2.1.1 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-contro
L Yes (X] No
If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 a
threshold?
KXINo = _L] Yes -- This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR
IP Regulation, schedule 2, tbe 3, tems Ha) and 3
FACID SULFATE SOILS
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed?’ in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning andX
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
(I No-cowa213 [] Yes
21 aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
If yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD?
CI No {X) Yes
If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?
(i) Excavating more than 1,000m? of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD BJ No 0 Yes
(ii) Filling the premises with 1,000m° or more of material with an average depth of [gq No CO Yes
0.5m on land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD
If yes to either or both (i) or (ii) above - This application must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW) as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 4; State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Aid Sulfate Souls, section 3.6
{COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT |
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
(i) Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district (J No 0 Yes
(ii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the [J No O Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?
(iii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the 63 No Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?
If yes to any one of {i) - (iii) above - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6
VEGETATION CLEARING |
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
(i) Avcategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) & No Yes
{ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation —&) No 0 Yes
JP Regulation, schedie 2, table 3, item 11
{CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE |
2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?
kK No - Go to Q2.1.6 oO Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 12 Agency
(PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT |
2.1.6 Is the proposed use of premises listed in schedule 13C of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
DX] No - Goto 92.1.7 (71 Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Requtation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0946 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.