Original source · versioned page text
Attachment D amended SWMP
Original PDF page 9, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
5.3 Rational Method Peak Flow Comparison
A summary of the existing and developed peak flow rates calculated using the Rational Method is provided in
Table 3 below.
Table 3 - Comparison of Pre- and Post-Development Peak Flow Rates
Design Discharge (m3/s)
Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
(63% AEP) (50% AEP) (20% AEP) (10% AEP) (5% AEP) (2% AEP) (1% AEP)
Development Area
Existing 0.059 0.079 0.110 0.128 0.153 0.193 0.222
Developed 0.106 0.143 0.196 0.229 0.272 0.336 0.370
0.048 0.064 0.087 0.101 0.120 0.143 0.147
Increase
55% 55% 56% 56% 56% 58% 60%
5.4 Pre- and Post-Development Design Flow Rates (unmitigated)
The table below, provides a summary of the pre-development design flow rates off the Development Area only
calculated using DRAINS:
Table 4 - Comparison of Pre- and Post-Development Design Flow Rates
Design Discharge (m3/s)
Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
(63% AEP) (50% AEP) (20% AEP) (10% AEP) (5% AEP) (2% AEP) (1% AEP)
External Catchment Only
External Catchment 0.168 0.227 0.313 0.365 0.434 0.531 0.585
Development Area Only
Existing 0.059 0.086 0.112 0.140 0.167 0.198 0.220
Developed 0.124 0.161 0.207 0.242 0.279 0.327 0.363
0.065 0.075 0.095 0.102 0.112 0.129 0.143
Increase
48% 53% 54% 58% 60% 61% 61%
Results show that, compared to pre-development design flow rates, without mitigation, there is an increase in
post-development flow rates off the Development Area.
BR210522_SBSMP_Rev5.docx Page 9 of 25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.