Original source · versioned page text
Information response
Attached to the e-mail Response to Info Request, Landscape plans & amended Proposal Plans (1) - 1 of 4 - MCU16/0081.
Issue 112 july 2013
DEFEND OR EVACUATE? WHY
RESIDENTS DELAY THIS DECISION
CONTEXT
To assist community members in preparing
for a bushfire, fire agencies need to
understand:
1. Why many community members delay
their decision to defend or evacuate
until the day of a fire.
2. What can be done to assist community
members plan for fires more
decisively, and therefore prepare more
effectively.
This research investigated what factors led
people to delay deciding on their fire response
before a fire occurred. Following collection
of this data, a workshop with community
engagement leaders from fire agencies
investigated two issues:
1. How can this research inform strategies
that aim to overcome the problems
associated with decision delay?
2. What are the most important barriers
that agencies may face in trying to
This study shows that residents need triggers to take different actions under a variety of conditions. implement such strategies?
SUMMARY BACKGROUND
This Fire Note outlines research investigating why many residents of bushfire prone areas Australian residents of bushfire-prone areas
delay their decision to defend or evacuate in response to a bushfire until the day of a have a choice between either defending
fire. The research examined several plausible reasons for such a delay stemming from their property or evacuating, preferably well
decision avoidance research. This Fire Note discusses the research findings, as well as the before the fire reaches their area. To increase
opportunities and obstacles to overcoming the problems associated with decision delay. successful execution of these two possible
bushfire responses, fire agencies encourage
Research showed that a lack of difference in the attractiveness between the options of
residents of bushfire-prone areas to determine
defending a house or evacuating was the only significant predictor of householders’
ahead of time what they will do in case of a
decision delay. Therefore, of the options investigated, this selection difficulty was the
fire, and properly prepare for this intended
only valid explanation for householders’ delaying their decision in response to a fire.
response. However, when given the choice
A solution to this involves appropriate triggers and subsequent actions to take under a
between defending or evacuating, many
variety of conditions.
people delay making this decision (i.e. wait
ABOUT THIS PROJECT and see; Whittaker et al., 2010).
This Fire Note is an update on the Information Processing Under Stress: Community Reactions This delay is problematic for several reasons.
project, conducted under the Bushfire CRC theme Communicating Risk. First, previous studies have shown that
AUTHORS people who delay this decision tend to be less
prepared for both defending and evacuating,
Dr Ilona (Illy) McNeill, Dr Patrick Dunlop and Mr Huw Flatau, School of Psychology,
compared with people who intend to respond
University of Western Australia, Professor Timothy Skinner, Charles Darwin University,
with one of the two more concrete actions
and Professor David Morrison, Murdoch University. For more information contact
(Dunlop et al., 2012). The decision delay
[email protected] increases risk to a person or household
© Bushfire CRC Ltd 2013 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.