Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Diane Jones
4. Conllrm Ihatlhe following mand<llory supportin9 information accolnpanieS this application
Mandatory supporting information COnflnnalion of Method 01
lodgement lodgement
AUappUcations
A sile plan d,awn 10 an appt>priate ..".le (1:100. t:200 0' 1:500 are ~nftrmed
.ecommended """Ies) wh;clJ show. the I_no:
• the location and .~e .,ea of the land 10which the eppIicafion relate •
(re/eVimlIanct)
• the nonh poln!
• the bounderie. of the relevanlland
• any road fronlage. oftf1e relevaD\ rand, Including the name of the mad
• Ihe 1l>Callonand uoe of any existing or proposed buildingS or swetu ••••
on the relevant land (nOle: wtl8r. extenslve demoliUon 0< new building'
a'e proposed. two separate plan. [an ""Istlng sne plan and proposed sita
plan) may be appropriale)
• .ny existing or PfOposed "" •• mants on the relevanlland and their
funetloo
• the lcoelian and use oJ build;ngs on land adJQjningthe relevant land
• all vehlde acee55 points and any existing 0' proposed ca. parl<Jng""'.s
on tho relevant land. Car parking spaces for pe<sons wilh disabil~ie. and
any ,,"lVlce vehicle occes. and parking should be oleaoy rnarMd
• for any new' building on the- relevant land, UUt location at refl.lSe s10rage
• the location of any PfOposed .etairing walls 011the retevan1rana ana 1I10lr
,
•
•
helgill •
tile location of any proposed landscaping on 111.reI~vanllan<i
tl'lelocatlon 01 any stormwaler detenlJon on the relevant land .
. ,
I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
I When the application involves new opcrntional work
, Plans ShooMg tile nature, 10C1ltion.number <>f new on-sOtaeer parl<ing blly$, .0'COnfirmed
propo ••• ~ eree of new landscaping, proposed fypo 01new vehicle cross-over
(nO!>-residentiSl us<ls), proposed maxlmum new vehl",lar $OfVicing .
o Not appllCll~
arrangemant (llOfHllsklenllal uses) of the proposed new operational wort:.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
re.quirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
705m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Diane JonesRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.