Traffic Engineering Letter · MCU24/0120

Issue — Frontage Works

The alignment of the proposed kerb and channel does not appear to smoothly transition
between sections. It is noted that the alignment of kerb and channel across the frontage of the
subject site was approved as part of an earlier approval for the subject site (MCU20/0024 &
OPW20/0055 — SCG Consulting drawing 30031-OW4.1 revision A).

The application been referred to Council's Infrastructure Team for comment and the footpath
along the frontage of the subject site is not required and must be removed from the relevant
plans.

Information Required

2. Provide amended civil works plans that are in accordance with SCG Consulting drawing
30031-OW4.1 revision A.

3. Remove footpath from the relevant plans.

Issue — Pergola

The proposed pergola/landscaped arbor within the front boundary setback of Unit 1 is
considered an unnecessary structure which contributes to the builds bulk to the street,
inconsistent with the established character and further restricts landscaping opportunities.

Information Required
4. Remove the structure from the front setback.

Issue — Landscaped Setback

Acceptable outcome AO12.2 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code talks to the front
6 metres being landscaped open space, with swimming pools, not protruding more than 1
metre above ground level, can be setback 2 metres. The proposed setback varies from 1.6-
1.7 metres, an increased setback is sought by the Codes.

Information Required
5. Provide increased soft landscaping setback of a minimum of 2 metres.
Issue — Front Fences and Walls

The architectural plans show the front fence achieving a maximum height of 2.65 metres. This
is not considered compatible with the street character and does not achieve Performance
outcome PO17.

PO17 Front fences and walls are designed and sited to:
a) contribute to the attractiveness of the streetscape;
b) be compatible with the existing streetscape character;
c) avoid interference with movement of surface stormwater;
d) allow for casual surveillance of the street;
e) provide planting in front of solid fences and walls; and

f) ensure plantings between the front fence and the footpath does not create an
impediment for pedestrians using the footpath.

Information Required
6. Provide revised fencing plan and address the above-mentioned outcome.
Issue — Plot Ratio

The below highlighted areas constitute gross floor area.

Document Set ID: 23290066 Page 2 of 4

Version: 2, Version Date: 10/10/2024