Original source · versioned page text
6. Noosa River DMP Ver0 (Combined)
Very large file (18.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 378, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
have been clearly and accurately identified and mapped to enable
risks and impacts to be properly assessed.
PO3 Development impacting marine plants: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO3
1. directly abuts land that has full riparian
access rights; or The proposed replenishment sites provide a public
2. provides a public facility. recreation facility.
Note: Further guidance on rights in context of fisheries resources
and fish habitats is provided in the operational policy provisions of
Management and protection of marine plants and other tidal fish
habitats (FHMOP 001), Department of Primary Industries and
Fisheries, 2007.
The provision of owner’s consent to lodge the development
application does not confer rights.
PO4 The spatial extent of disturbance to marine For work associated with private development that is Complies with PO4
plants is minimised. a jetty, pontoon or boat ramp only:
This report identifies the extent of marine plants within
Note: For more information, refer to relevant fish habitat
management operational policies and fish habitat guidelines:
AO4.1 Only one structure adjoins the property. the extraction and replenishment areas. Of the plants
1. Management and protection of marine plants and other
identified, only one mangrove specimen cannot be
tidal fish habitats (FHMOP 001), Department of Primary Note: A structure includes boat ramps, jetties and avoided.
Industries and Fisheries, 2007 pontoons
2. Tidal fish habitats, erosion control and beach Recommendations have been made to minimise
replenishment (FHMOP 010), Department of Primary
impacts to this specimen by either:
Industries and Fisheries, 2007 AND
3. Dredging, extraction and spoil disposal activities • reducing the level of replenishment material
(FHMOP 004), Department of Primary Industries, 1998
4. Departmental procedures for permit applications AO4.2 The extent of marine plants removed, so that the pneumatophores are not fully
assessment and approvals for insect pest control in damaged or destroyed does not exceed two metres cover; or
wetlands (FHMOP 003), Department of Primary along the waterway frontage (width). • placing the replenishment material outside
Industries, 1996
5. Fisheries guidelines for fish-friendly structures (FHG the tree protection zone and allowing natural
006), Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, AND
processes to increase sediment.
2006.
AO4.3 The long-term use and and operability of the
development will not result in ongoing adverse
impacts or new adverse impacts or additional
development. For example, a proposed jetty will not
result in the need to dredge navigation access to the
development in the future.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 3 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.