Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0087 [As Published]

of 42

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (11.9 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

               DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT DELEGATED REPORT
                   d. do not create opportunities for overlooking the private open space or internal spaces of
                      neighbourhood properties.
               Noting the above assessment regarding the House 3 terrace not being supported, the following is
               in relation to the House 1 & 2 roof terraces only.
               The roof terraces are proposed to be setback a minimum of 2.4m from the north eastern boundary
               and include screening along the north eastern elevation of the terraces and the north west of the
               House 1 terrace. In addition, the House 1 terrace is also setback a minimum of 4.5m from the side
               boundary. The applicant has provided diagrams demonstrating the view lines of each of the
               terraces, indicating the location and screening of the terraces will not allow for opportunities for
               overlooking the private open space of adjoining properties, whilst providing for a varied skyline and
               avoiding a box profile. The proposal is therefore considered to comply with O8 of the High Density
               Residential Zone Code.




                      Figure 20: Section plan showing proximity to rear property (Berrima Row) and screening of terrace




                                                        Figure 21: View line diagram

               Carparking
               Acceptable Outcome AO13 of the Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code requires one
               covered space per small dwelling (<100m2) and two covered spaces for all other dwellings
               (>100m2) plus one additional space per four dwellings. The applicant has stated that House 1 is
               99m2 (and as such complies with the small dwelling definition), whilst Houses 2 & 3 are in excess
               of 100m2, and therefore the proposal is required to provide 6 carparks on site. Council calculations
               however indicate all three dwellings are in excess of 100m2 (House 1 – ≈102m2, House 2 – ≈105m2,
               House 3 – ≈109m2). Noting the potential for a small margin of error in relation to Council
               measurements, a condition is included in the recommendation requiring House 1 to remain less
               than 100m2 to ensure compliance with parking requirements.




Document Set ID: 22374890
Version: 10, Version Date: 06/08/2023
Log in to download the original file

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0087 [As Published].pdf · 11.9 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.