Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Planning & Organisation Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 6 Draft Flying Fox Management Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn draft
5.2 Risk of management
Management Risk Risk score Mitigation measures Residual
option (refer to risk score
Appendix 1)
Education Nil N/A N/A N/A
General mitigation Cost which may not mitigate 17 See Sections 4 and 6 for most suitable 9
measures impacts. mitigation measures, and potential for
grants etc.
In-situ Moderate cost which may be 17 Detailed plan developed prior to works 8
management insufficient to mitigate commencing.
community impacts.
Impact to animal welfare. 17 Ensure management is not done near 3
roosting flying-foxes during the pupping
season, and flying-foxes are monitored
for signs of stress during significant
works (i.e. tree removal). Develop a
detailed works plan prior to
commencing.
Inadvertent dispersal 8 Ensure management is not done near 3
roosting flying-foxes during the pupping
season, and flying-foxes are monitored
for signs of stress during significant
works (i.e. tree removal). Develop a
detailed works plan prior to
commencing.
Dispersal Impact to animal welfare and 21 18
flying-fox conservation.
Increased aircraft strike risk 24 19
associated with changed
flying-fox movement patterns.
Splintering the roost into other 21 21
locations that are equally or
more problematic.
Shifting the issue to another 21 21
area.
Increasing disease status and 22 Appropriate planning for a dispersal 18
associated public health risk. can reduce risks (detailed dispersal
strategy required), however despite
Impacts to nearby residents 16 careful planning risks remain at 16
associated with ongoing moderate-high.
dispersal attempts.
Excessive initial and/or 23 23
ongoing resource and
financial investment.
Negative public perception 17 17
and backlash.
Impact on habitat value (with 23 23
significant vegetation
management).
Classification Action required
20-25 = EXTREME Unacceptable risk. Do not proceed. Controls required to reduce risk.
16-19 = HIGH Unacceptable risk. Do not proceed. Controls required to reduce risk.
7-15 = MODERATE Acceptable with adequate controls in place.
1-6 = LOW Low risk.
Flying-fox roost management options ecosure.com.au | 22
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.