Original source · versioned page text
2014-07-22 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 22 JULY 2014
Infrastructure Uses The Code includes requirements around two central themes - Health
Code & Safety and Visual Amenity.
Health & Safety
The Specific Outcomes of the Code require the development to avoid
unacceptable risks to the environment or to personal and public
safety. The applicant has provided a summary of the maximum
cumulative radiofrequency (RF) and electromagnetic energy (EME)
levels at ground level emitted from the proposed tower, assuming full
power usage. The summary indicates the proposed tower will emit a
maximum EME level from the tower, which is 0.021% of the
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency’s
(ARPANSA) regulated acceptable maximum radiation public
exposure limits.
Taking a precautionary approach to the sensitive issue concerning
health and safety over time, certification is to be provided by the
telecommunications carrier upon request. The certification must
demonstrate annual compliance with the Health & Safety
requirements compared to ARPANSA regulations.
Visual Amenity
Probable Solution 10.1 requires that the tower is not established in
the Detached Housing, Semi Attached Housing, Attached Housing or
Visitor Mixed Use zones. Probable Solution 10.3 also requires the
tower not to exceed 25m in the rural zone. The proposed 31m tower
is located within the Rural zone.
The corresponding Specific Outcome O39 seeks that the tower is
visually integrated with its landscape or townscape setting so as not
to be visually dominant or obtrusive.
The monopole has been sited amongst existing vegetation, and is
setback more than 270m from the closest residential dwelling. The
proposal is visually integrated with its setting so as not to dominate
when viewed from surrounding areas, complying with the Specific
Outcomes of this code.
A condition may be imposed for the development to be finished with
suitable muted tones, the tower to be restricted to 31m in height, and
for no lights to be attached. A condition may also be imposed for
existing vegetation to be secured around the perimeter of the lease
area, which would assist in visually screening the tower
infrastructure.
Overlay Provisions
The following overlay codes are applicable to this application:
Natural Hazards Overlay (Medium Bushfire Hazard Area)
The proposed development is a non-habitable structure, which will not result in an increase
in the number of people living, working or congregating in the mapped bushfire hazard area,
thus meeting the outcomes of the Natural Hazards Overlay.
Natural Resources (Agricultural Land Conservation Area)
Page 32 of 133
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.