Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission Object - Ramon Pollad - MCU18/0019

of 1

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

    •••
    .~:a.No6sA COUNCIU         '    ..   ,.                         ,
                                                                                                                    Notice of Submission
                                                                                                                                            9
I               -----~.                                                         --.,---
     To ensure your submission Is property made you must ensure that
     1. be made to the assessment manager
     2 be In writing
     3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronl
     4. slate the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
     5.' slate what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
     6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period                                                                                       !

As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including Individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.
11. Application details
IFile No. MCU18/ 0019.                                                                                                                                        _
: Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville
I Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility)

lFull name of Submitter                       ~~\'I.<>o,'\-2o\\~c..\.                                                                                         ~
I Postal address             _ ~.. _'B.!'=>v':'.cl.i-_Ct:                                                                                                         j
I Suburb                     'tJ_t_(CQ.' ..L~                           .                     ' State           Q             Postcode        4--'SJJ~
Is/gnature(s)                                 J(if;;(J.JC                   ,                                                            __ ... ~
    3. Details of Suhmission
! I (We), make the following submission:
ill.I object to the proposed development because it will Impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is
 Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which Is basically one continuous building
                                                                                                                                                                  i
itaking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.     ---l
12. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as a result of the development.
I                                                                                                  .
                                                                                                                                                                  I,
! 3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is In direct conflict with                                    '
i the Noose Plan. The Noose Plan was drafted       based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
I   the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed
    development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,
    which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial In nature.

14. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site.                                                                     ~

    5. I understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however. they should be located
    in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development.

 6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
1 parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly
 'across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem
\ with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.
'.--------                         --.           -----------~---.                                       ~---.
                                                                                                                                                                  ,
                                                                                                                                                                  I

I                                                                                                                                                                 I

    Privacy
    Council will use any personallnfonnatJon provided for the Intended purpose only and for remaining In contact with you. Council I. euthorlaed to collect
    this InfonnatJon In accordance with the LocsJ Government Act 2009 and other Local GovemmentActs. Your personallnfonnatlon         is only acceased by
    persons authorised to do so, Your personallnfonnatJon Is deall with In accordance with counclr. privacy polley.


    www.noosa.gld.goV.8U                        I   [email protected],gov.au                  T 07 ~329 6500
    PO Box 141 Tewantin Old 4565
                                                                                          I   ABN 97009 214121

                                                                                                                                                 Page 1 of 1

Used in these records

About this file

File size
650 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Ramon Pollad - MCU18_0019.pdf · 650 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.