Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

20240510_NSC_M1717P_MCU minor change request.pdf

of 8

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

.


        ii)        If a development application for the
                   development, including the change, were
                   made when the change application is made
                   would not cause -
                        a) The inclusion of prohibited              Complies – The proposed does not introduce prohibited
                            development in the application; or      development.
                        b) Referral to a referral agency, other     Complies – The proposed development does not require
                            than to the chief executive, if there   the development to be referred to a referral agency nor
                            were no referral agencies for the       additional matters prescribed by a regulation under
                            development application; or             section 55(2).
                        c) Referral to extra referral agencies,
                            other than to the chief executive; or
                        d) A referral agency to assess the
                            application against or have regard to
                            matters prescribed by the regulation
                            under section 55 (2), other than
                            matters the referral agency must have
                            assessed the application against, or
                            have had regard to, when the
                            application was made; or
                        e) public notification if public            Complies – The proposed amendment is minor in nature
                            notification was not required for the   and will not trigger the requirement for public
                            development application.                notification.
Table 1 – ‘Minor change’ criteria (Schedule 2 - Dictionary)


The proposed change represents a minor change under Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the
outcome does not result in ‘substantially different’ development as outlined below.

    Substantially Different Criteria                              Response
    A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:
        a) involves a new use                                     Complies – the change does not involve a new use
        b) results in the application applying to a new parcel Complies – the proposed change will not result in any
           of land; or                                            new parcels of land being included as part of the
                                                                  application
        c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of        Complies – the proposed change does not involve any
           scale, bulk and appearance; or                         changes to the approved built form
        d) changes the ability of the proposed development Complies – the proposed change does not change the
           to operate as intended; or                             ability for the development to operate as intended
        e) removes a component that is integral to the            Complies – The proposed change does not remove a
           operation of the development; or                       component that is integral to the development
        f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the          Complies – The proposed amendments will not result in
           transport network, such as increasing traffic to       any additional impacts not already addressed as part of
           the site; or                                           the original approval
        g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of Complies – The proposed amendment will not result in
           known impacts; or                                      increased severity of known impacts.




JFP Ref: M1717P.                                                                                                  Page 6


[OCR of page images]
   

IJFOP

DAMIAN
URBANCONSULTANTS

 

ii) If a development application for the
development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made
would not cause -

a) The inclusion of prohibited
development in the application; or
Referral to a referral agency, other
than to the chief executive, if there
were no referral agencies for the
development application; or
Referral to extra referral agencies,
other than to the chief executive; or
A referral agency to assess the
application against or have regard to
matters prescribed by the regulation
under section 55 (2), other than
matters the referral agency must have
assessed the application against, or
have had regard to, when the
application was made; or
public notification if public
notification was not required for the
development application.

b)

e)

 

Complies — The proposed does not introduce prohibited
development.

Complies — The proposed development does not require
the development to be referred to a referral agency nor
additional matters prescribed by a regulation under
section 55(2).

Complies — The proposed amendment is minor in nature
and will not trigger the requirement for public
notification.

 

 

 

Table 1 — ‘Minor change’ criteria (Schedule 2 - Dictionary)

The proposed change represents a minor change under Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the

outcome does not result in ‘substantially different’ development as outlined below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substantially Different Criteria | Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:
a) involves a new use Complies — the change does not involve a new use
b) results in the application applying to a new parcel | Complies — the proposed change will not result in any
of land; or new parcels of land being included as part of the
application
c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of Complies — the proposed change does not involve any
scale, bulk and appearance; or changes to the approved built form
d) changes the ability of the proposed development | Complies — the proposed change does not change the
to operate as intended; or ability for the development to operate as intended
e) removes a component that is integral to the Complies — The proposed change does not remove a
operation of the development; or component that is integral to the development
f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the Complies — The proposed amendments will not result in
transport network, such as increasing traffic to any additional impacts not already addressed as part of
the site; or the original approval
g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of | Complies — The proposed amendment will not result in
known impacts; or increased severity of known impacts.

 

 

 

JFP Ref: M1717P.

Page 6

Log in to download the original (20240510_NSC_M1717P_MCU minor change request.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.