Original source · versioned page text
Amended Noosa Project Restoration Plan V12_5
Attached to the e-mail OPW22/0029 - SRA application correspondence - Referral agency response – with conditions.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSECTION 2 – RESTORATION MODELS
Habitat and restoration suitability modelling are analytical techniques used to select broad restoration
zones and local restoration sites that are suitable for oyster ecosystem restoration within an estuary.
It is within the restoration sites that restoration substrates (in this case principally rock riprap) is
placed to form the foundation of new oyster beds.
2.1 Habitat suitability
Where shellfish ecosystem restoration is conducted often determines how successful an effort is. In
Noosa, TNC used standardized habitat suitability indices and geospatial decision support tools to
confirm the suitability of the Noosa River estuary for oyster ecosystem restoration.
Known environmental and biological criteria of the dominant rock oyster species, Sydney Rock Oyster
(Saccostrea glomerata), were compared with the physical parameters of the estuary (i.e. bathymetry,
salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen,). Areas of the estuary which are suitable for rock oyster
restoration were then rated for their suitability (Table 2.1) and presented, geospatially, in the Habitat
Suitability Model (Figure 2.1).
While the Habitat Suitability Model indicates that large areas of Lake Doonella and Lake Weyba would
be suitable for rock oyster restoration, practically, this would not be the case (as per the Restoration
Suitability Model presented further on in this submission). Further challenges in the lakes include high
sediment loads, high retention of suspended sediments after storms and low flow regimes. These
possible limitations would need to be tested as part of Phase II restoration works.
Table 2.1: Habitat suitability parameters and criteria for Sydney rock oysters
PARAMETER ENVELOPE CRITERIA Rationale Source
(more
suitable = 4,
less = 0)
Bathymetry 0-9 m 0-9m = 4 Within ecological tolerances. (Powers et al. 2009, Gillies et
>9m = 0 Below LAT weighted higher as al. 2018)
subtidal restored oyster
ecosystems have been seen to
perform better than intertidal
ecosystems.
Salinity Av 25-35ppt 35-30=4; Within ecological tolerances. (Nell and Gibbs 1986, Nell
30-25=3; Lower salinities scored lower as and Holliday 1988, Holliday
<25=0 linked to outbreaks of the 1995, Dove 2003, Butt et al.
protozoan parasite QX 2006, Dove and O’Connor
(Marteilia 16ydney). 2007, Diggles 2013,
Schrobback et al. 2014)
Temperature 8-29C 8-24C= 4; Within ecological tolerances. (Holliday 1995, Butt et al.
Max 24-28 = 2; Temperatures above 28 °C 2006, Diggles 2013,
>28=0 scored lower as linked to Schrobback et al. 2014,
outbreaks of the protozoan Snyder et al. 2017)
parasite QX (Marteilia sydneyi).
DO Av >4mg/L >4mg/L = 4; Within ecological tolerances. (Schrobback et al. 2014)
<4mg/L= 0
16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.