Council archive · source document
08/1704 - Minor change to development application [As Published] · 142008.1704.03
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Form 2, Version 4.1, 3 March 2008
4. Can the premises best be identified by coordinates (e.g. for development proposed in waters, or on a site within a large rural lot)?
(J No
CO Yes - Complete Table D
5. What is the total area that makes up the premises (i. the area covered by the application)?
Area of land above high-water mark/outside watercourse : Area in a water body or watercourse
pg Ci hectares | 135 09 & C7 hectares
{Tick applicable unit) , (Tick applicable unit)
{Owner's consent and resource owner's agreement - ‘ * |
6. Is the person making the request the owner of the land to which the approval attaches?
® Yes oO No - Complete Table E - provide details for each owner on a separate row, or on an attachment to this form if applicable. Note: Advice
provided at the end of this form details when owner's consent is not required.
7. \fan application for the existing approval were being made now (i.e. at the time of making this request), would evidence be required to
support the application because it involved taking or interfering with a State-owned resource prescribed by schedule 10 of the Integrated
Planning Regulation 1998 (IP Reg) or any other regulation
(CINo =] Yes - Complete Table F and submit, with the application, written agreement to the request.
Table F ” Nature of State-owned resource Relevant State Govemment Department Date writen agreement of the |
chief executive was obtained |
15. Water taken or interfered with under the Water Ac| Environmental Protection Agency 21-Nov-2008
\Nature of the request
8. What is the nature of the request for change? (Tick the applicable box/es)
(J An extension of the period before an approval lapses (under IPA, section 3.5.22)
[X] To change the development approval other than a change of condition (under IPA, section 3.5.24)
(C] To change or cancel a condition of approval (under IPA, section 3.5.33) - Go to Q11
o To change conditions of a rezoning approval given under the Local Government (Planning and Environment) Act 1990 (under IPA,
section 6.1.35A) - Go to Q12
9, Were one or more concurrence agencies involved in the approval?
No LX] Yes - Complete Table G. Submit, with the application, a copy of the notice required to be sent to each agency under IPA sections
3.5,22(1)(a) and 3.5.24(1)(b).
Table G i Each concurrence agency
iE . : ..__ (use a separate row for each agency) Date notice sent
Environmental Protection Agency
2 | Maritime Safety Queensland
10. Does the request for change relate to an aspect of the approval that involved a building referral agency?
4 No | Yes - Complete Table H. Submit, with the application, a copy of the notice required to be sent to each agency under IPA section
3.5.24(1)(b).
Details and reasons or justification for the request « : _ aa i |
11, What are the details of the requested change and the reasons or justification for the change? Use a different row for each change if more
than one.
Details: of requested change (including extension of:the period'if relevant) Reasons or justification for the requested change
a gangway is more suitable for the site than a fixed jetty going to a floating
pontoon
to replace the fixed jetty and floating pontoon with a floating gangway
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1704 - Minor change to development application [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 807 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.