Original source · versioned page text
App D - Minor Change and Substantially Different Development Tests
Minor Change Application
Part 4 of Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules (the ‘DA Rules’) specifies what may
constitute ‘substantially different development’ within the context of the meaning of a minor change to
a development approval. An assessment of the proposed changes against the various aspects of the
‘substantially different development’ definition is provided in the table below.
Table 6.2: Part 4 of Schedule 1 of the DA Rules – Substantially Different Development Test
No. # Criteria Review
(a) Involves a new use. No new uses are proposed.
As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
(b) Results in the application The extent of the site has not changed.
applying to a new parcel of As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
land.
(c) Dramatically changes the built The proposal does not dramatically change the built form in terms
form in terms of scale, bulk of scale, bulk, or appearance.
and appearance. As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
(d) Changes the ability of the There are no changes proposed that would affect the ability of the
proposed development to development to operate as intended.
operate as intended. As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
(e) Removes a component that is There is no component being removed that is integral to the
integral to the operation of the operation of the development.
development. As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
(f) Significantly impacts on traffic No significant additional impacts upon the broader traffic network
flow and the transport will occur due to the proposed changes.
network, such as increasing As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
traffic to the site.
(g) Introduces new impacts or No new impacts are proposed and no increase in the severity of
increase the severity of known known impacts are anticipated.
impacts. As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
(h) Removes an incentive or No incentives or offsets exist or shall be varied as part of the
offset component that would proposed works.
have balanced a negative As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
impact of the development.
(i) Impacts on infrastructure The proposed changes do not impact the infrastructure.
provisions. As such, the amended development complies with this criterion.
9 George Street, Noosaville (Our Ref: 2026-03-795 / Council ref: MCU25/0057, OPW25/0078 and RAL25/0010) 22
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.