Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094 · MCU24/0094

of 68

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (12.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 37, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

                                33 Ross Crescent, Sunshine Beach – Coastal Hazzard Assessment | 33 Ross Crescent Family Trust




Figure 6-9 Beach profile and storm profile ETA 602 (BMT, 2018)


6.4.2.   Depth of closure
BTM (2018) calculated the depth of closure to be around 11-12m for Noosa beaches and adopted 11.5m
for the Brunn Rule calculation. The assessment herein adopted 12m for the Brunn Rule calculation. This
small difference has a negligible effect on the Brunn Rule calculation.


6.4.3.   Dune Toe
BMT (2018) determined the dune toe position by utilising the manually digitised coastline from the
Department of Resources and incorporating guidance from the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) contour.

The RHDHV (2024) and the assessment herein adopted a level of 2.3m AHD as the toe of the dune based
on site observations, detailed survey, the current vegetation line and interpretation across the creek mouth
based on the ‘Coastal Hazards Technical Guide’ (Department of Environment and Heritage Protection,
2013) (refer Section 2.4).


6.4.4.   Active beach width
The active beach width represents the horizontal distance from the dune height to the depth of closure.
BMT (2018) adopted active beach widths of 525m and 595m for ETA 602 and ETA596, respectively.

The assessment herein adopted an active beach width of 600m. The variation in these measurements is
attributed to the different dune heights adopted.


6.4.5.   Dune height
Figure 6-10 shows the dune heights adopted by BMT (2018) and RHDHV against the beach profile adopted
for the assessment in this report. BMT (2018) adopted 4.9m AHD which corresponds to the frontal dune
and therefore underestimates the reserve of sand available in the dune system.

RHDHV (2024) adopted a dune height of 7m AHD which was determine over an iterative process (see
Section 6.2.3). This assessment has shown the 7m AHD dune height is still appropriate with a 1.79m AHD
storm tide level.




                                                                                                                          30

Used in these records

About this file

File size
12.4 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094.pdf · 12.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.