Council archive · source document
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094 · MCU24/0094
Very large file (12.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 37, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
33 Ross Crescent, Sunshine Beach – Coastal Hazzard Assessment | 33 Ross Crescent Family Trust Figure 6-9 Beach profile and storm profile ETA 602 (BMT, 2018) 6.4.2. Depth of closure BTM (2018) calculated the depth of closure to be around 11-12m for Noosa beaches and adopted 11.5m for the Brunn Rule calculation. The assessment herein adopted 12m for the Brunn Rule calculation. This small difference has a negligible effect on the Brunn Rule calculation. 6.4.3. Dune Toe BMT (2018) determined the dune toe position by utilising the manually digitised coastline from the Department of Resources and incorporating guidance from the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) contour. The RHDHV (2024) and the assessment herein adopted a level of 2.3m AHD as the toe of the dune based on site observations, detailed survey, the current vegetation line and interpretation across the creek mouth based on the ‘Coastal Hazards Technical Guide’ (Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, 2013) (refer Section 2.4). 6.4.4. Active beach width The active beach width represents the horizontal distance from the dune height to the depth of closure. BMT (2018) adopted active beach widths of 525m and 595m for ETA 602 and ETA596, respectively. The assessment herein adopted an active beach width of 600m. The variation in these measurements is attributed to the different dune heights adopted. 6.4.5. Dune height Figure 6-10 shows the dune heights adopted by BMT (2018) and RHDHV against the beach profile adopted for the assessment in this report. BMT (2018) adopted 4.9m AHD which corresponds to the frontal dune and therefore underestimates the reserve of sand available in the dune system. RHDHV (2024) adopted a dune height of 7m AHD which was determine over an iterative process (see Section 6.2.3). This assessment has shown the 7m AHD dune height is still appropriate with a 1.79m AHD storm tide level. 30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.