Council archive · source document
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094 · MCU24/0094
Very large file (12.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 39, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
33 Ross Crescent, Sunshine Beach – Coastal Hazzard Assessment | 33 Ross Crescent Family Trust Figure 6-11 North Sea storm surge hydrograph (Vellinga, 1983) 6.4.8. Wave Height BMT (2018), RHDHV (2024) and the assessment herein adopted an offshore significant wave height of 6.2m based on a previous study of coastal processes on the Sunshine Coast (BMT, 2013). 6.4.9. Long-term erosion Digital Earth Australia and CoastSat have calculated the long-term recession rates. Figure 3-9 shows that the long-term change in shoreline position in the immediate vicinity of the site is approximately 0.4m annually (±0.3m at 95% confidence interval). Given the long-term stability of this section of coast a nominal 10m has been adopted in accordance with the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (2013). The long-term erosion of 10m aligns with the evaluation conducted by BMT (2018). 6.4.10. Short-term erosion The BMT (2018) evaluation of short-term erosion was undertaken using the Vellinga method. Vellinga (1983) presents an empirical method for estimating beach erosion associated with a designated storm event. The required input parameters described in Vellinga (1983) involve the deep-water significant wave height (HOS) and storm surge. The description in Vellinga (1983) implies that storm surge is distinct from wave setup, which is implicitly encompassed in the empirical model. BMT (2018) adopted a conservative assessment adopting a design water level of 2.11m AHD (i.e. storm tide + wave setup). Acknowledging the inclusion of wave setup is not consistent with Vellinga (1983), they stated, "This is considered a conservative approach since the erosion model only necessitates input of the ‘surge plus tide’ level, and the additional contribution of wave setup to the extreme water level leads to an increase in the predicted erosion volume" (BMT, 2018). The BMT (2018) assessment also did not appear to include the storm profile termination at a depth of 75% of the deep-water significant wave height (refer Figure 6-1 above). In accordance with the input parameters described in Vellinga (1983), RHDHV (2024) adopted a 100-year ARI storm tide level of 1.74m (exclusive of wave setup). To address Noosa Shire Council’s further information request dated 19 December 2024 this assessment adopted a storm tide level of 1.79m AHD to reassess the erosion prone area. The minor increase in storm tide level of 0.05m has been shown to have negligible impact on the estimated erosion profile at the site. 32
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.