Council archive · source document
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094 · MCU24/0094
Very large file (12.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 44, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
33 Ross Crescent, Sunshine Beach – Coastal Hazzard Assessment | 33 Ross Crescent Family Trust 7. Coastal Protection Works In this instance the provision of coastal protection works (e.g. rock revetment) within the property to protect development against coastal hazards is not considered a viable option due to the height of the land. A rock revetment would need to be constructed at a significant depth below the existing ground level that would result in significant earthworks and impact to surrounding dune vegetation. To ensure the proposed house and pool can withstand future potential erosion events and not adversely impact on coastal processes it is recommended that a piled foundation be included in the design sufficient to withstand erosion and maintain the stability of the building for the geotechnical conditions at the site. The piled foundation should be prepared by a geotechnical engineer considering the theoretical beach profile associated with the erosion prone area assessment presented in this report and slope stability. 37
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - Coastal Hazard Assessment - MCU24 0094Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.