Council archive · source document
Attachment 7 - Economic Need and Impact Assessment · MCU13/0251
must be weighed against the replacement and improvement of retail facilities that a new development might bring. It is also relevant to consider the existing trading performance of retailers, insofar as an impact greater than 15% on turnover at a centre trading above benchmark levels is unlikely to affect its viability or its ability to respond to competitive pressure. In contrast in areas of high growth potential, impacts on centre turnovers well above the 15% usually can be absorbed with little difficulty. Growth in the pool of retail expenditure available to support all retail centres usually will quickly restore turnover initially lost to a new competitive centres in such areas. 5.1.1 Impact of Proposed Retail Development The extent of impact of the proposed development on other centres is largely driven by the proposed limited line supermarket. Within the trade area, there are limited take home food or grocery opportunities. The trade area only hosts a single 290m2 Friendly Grocer food store, supported by a green grocer and bakery. Existing retail provision within the trade area is concentrated in in dining & take-away food and personal & other goods retailing. Overall, the existing Peregian Beach neighbourhood centre has a strong visitor as opposed to convenience focus. While material impacts are likely to be sustained by the Peregian Beach neighbourhood centre, the proposed development is expected to result in a reduction expenditure currently leaking to supermarket anchored centres outside the trade area located at Peregian Springs and Coolum. Table 5.1 below indicates that the most significant impacts (in terms of a percentage reduction in turnover) are likely to be sustained by • Peregian Springs Shopping Centre (Coles anchored): 7.8%; • Peregian Beach neighbourhood centre: 7.1%; • Coolum Shopping Village (Coles anchored): 5.3%; • Coolum Park Shopping Centre (Woolworths anchored): 4.8%; and • Coolum Esplanade (Main Street): 4.3%. The scale of anticipated impacts is not sufficient to threaten the viability of any existing or approved centre development within or near the proposed development’s trade area. Notably, approximately 80% of the proposed development’s turnover is in the form of reduced escape expenditure, rather than impacts on centres located within the trade area. Centre impacts sustained by the Peregian Springs Shopping Centre are likely to be ameliorated rapidly by take-up of residential allotments in the Peregian Springs master planned community. Similarly, residential growth in and around Coolum can be expected to ameliorate impacts at Coolum based centres. The proposed development responds to a clear gap in the local retail network, whereby a discrete community of approximately 4,500 persons has limited access to convenience retail facilities unless they choose to access centres outside their community. The introduction of a new retail development in any area results in tenant relocation and trading impacts on individual tenancies. However, the nature of retail provision within Peregian Beach neighbourhood centre is characterised by a large number of smaller scale tenancies (i.e. generally less than 200m2), which can be used for various uses. Any closures of individual tenancies (if any) would be more than Peregian Village Market Economic Need and Impact Assessment 24 December 2013 13034 Report Rev 0
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 7 - Economic Need and Impact AssessmentRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 805 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.