MCU180015 - Submission - Narelle Kearney · MCU18/0015

Conclusion
It is accepted that the planning scheme anticipates some level of residential development in discrete parts of
the site as is reflected in the zone plan. This intended land use pattern considers landslide risk, biodiversity
values and also the scale and character of existing development adjoining the eastern boundary of the site.
Based on the points described above, we strongly object to this development application and, in particular, the
multiple dwelling component along the western section of the site as:
    •    it completely disregards the intent of land uses as expressed in the zone pattern that reflects community
         expectations and amenity standards for the locality,
    •     this is clearly in the steepest past of the site (as confirmed by Council's own topographic mapping) and
          represents a significant risk from landslide hazard to people and property including building adjoining
          the western boundary of the site;
    •     the proposed development density greatly exceeds site cover and plot ratio thresholds for land in the
          Attached Housing zone; and
    •     ultimately the large development footprint results in the loss of remnant coastal habitat that is intended
          to be conserved and protected in the planning scheme.


        • NareIle Kearney



    .3 /34-                                        (\pc\                  9Q?).
                                  \-\‘‘o.cLo              14-S (6-1