137996_IR Response FINAL_9.2.18

         turn lanes for any other developments in the vicinity of the site, most of which have comparable traffic
         generations (including several service stations) to the proposed development.
    e. In order to move the location of the bus stop, no existing infrastructure would require relocation. The
       existing power pole situated next to the current bus shelter is unaffected by the proposed stop layout.
       However, as mentioned in the traffic report, some on-street parking will have to be removed to
       accommodate the ingress crossover; and
    f.   Road widening is not required.
Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Response Memorandum

      10. Amended plans which detail that there will be no bowsers at the end of the canopy or plans
          amended so that this conflict is removed.

Response:
As demonstrated within the functional layout plans included as part of the traffic response memorandum
(Appendix D), there is only a minor conflict that occurs between the end bowsers and HRV’s. It is submitted
that given this conflict will occur infrequently, for the isolated occasions a vehicle is using the southernmost
bowser, the RCV will need to wait momentarily. Accordingly, it is not proposed that the southern bowsers be
removed. In the event that the frequency of conflict becomes an issue, the service station manager may
implement strategies to assist access, such as temporarily blocking access to the southernmost bowser.
Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Response Memorandum


We trust this information is sufficient for your purposes. Should you require further details or wish to discuss
these matters, please contact the writer on (07) 5436 7837.
Yours faithfully,
RPS




SOPHIE WILLIAMS
Senior Planner




| MCU17/0572 | Information Request Response                                                                Page 6