Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf

  Performance outcomes                                                             Acceptable outcomes                                                        Response
                                                                                   Note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, a koala
                                                                                   management plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced
                                                                                   person.

                                                                                   AND

                                                                                   AO4.2 Interfering with koala habitat complies with the
                                                                                   sequential clearing and koala spotter requirements under
                                                                                   section 10 and 11 of the Nature Conservation (Koala)
                                                                                   Conservation Plan 2017.
  Matters of State Environmental Significance
  PO5 Development:                                                                 No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                                       Complies with PO5 – The proposed development will result
                                                                                                                                                              in the removal of 19 NJKHTs from the site, for which an
  1.   avoids impacts on matters of state environmental                                                                                                       environmental offset is to be provided. The proposed
       significance; or                                                                                                                                       development will minimise and mitigate matters of state
  2.   minimises and mitigates impacts on matters of state                                                                                                    environmental significance which cannot be reasonably
       environmental significance after demonstrating                                                                                                         avoided (refer Appendix B). There are no other matters of
       avoidance is not reasonably possible; and                                                                                                              state environmental significance on the subject land.
  3.   provides an offset if, after demonstrating all reasonable
       avoidance, minimisation and mitigation measures are
       undertaken, the development results in an acceptable
       significant residual impact on a matter of state
       environmental significance that is a prescribed
       environmental matter.

  Note: Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
  impact on koala habitat areas is provided in Chapter 2A of the Queensland
  Environmental Offsets Policy.
  Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
  impact on all other matters of state environmental significance is provided in
  the Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of State Development,
  Infrastructure and Planning, 2014.

  Category C and R vegetation
  PO6 Development:                                                                 No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
  1.   avoids impacts on category C areas of vegetation and
       category R areas of vegetation; or
  2.   minimises and mitigates impacts on category C areas
       of vegetation and category R areas of vegetation after
       demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably possible.




State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas                                                                                                                       Page 2 of 2


[OCR of page images]
formance outcomes

 

Acceptable outcomes

Note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, a koala
management plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced
person.

AND

AO4.2 Interfering with koala habitat complies with the
sequential clearing and koala spotter requirements under
section 10 and 11 of the Nature Conservation (Koala)
Conservation Plan 2017.

 

 

Matters of State Environmental Significance

 

POS Development:

1. avoids impacts on matters of state environmental
significance; or

2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters of state
environmental significance after demonstrating
avoidance is not reasonably possible; and

3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all reasonable
avoidance, minimisation and mitigation measures are
undertaken, the development results in an acceptable
significant residual impact on a matter of state
environmental significance that is a prescribed
environmental matter.

Note: Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on koala habitat areas is provided in Chapter 2A of the Queensland
Environmental Offsets Policy.

Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on all other matters of state environmental significance is provided in
the Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of State Development,
Infrastructure and Planning, 2014.

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Complies with POS — The proposed development will result
in the removal of 19 NJKHTs from the site, for which an
environmental offset is to be provided. The proposed
development will minimise and mitigate matters of state
environmental significance which cannot be reasonably
avoided (refer Appendix B). There are no other matters of
state environmental significance on the subject land.

 

Category C and R vegetation

 

PO6 Development:

1. avoids impacts on category C areas of vegetation and
category R areas of vegetation; or

2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category C areas
of vegetation and category R areas of vegetation after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably possible.

 

 

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

 

 

State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6

State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas

Page 2 of 2