Original source · versioned page text
2022-09-06 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 SEPTEMBER 2022
Page 58 of 63
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 SEPTEMBER 2022
5.0. DES Perspective - Team Leader Waste Development and Southeast Compliance
Officer
Existing requirements are in place under the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation
(CPMR) 2017 for pontoon design.
Review of regulation and practices needed to ensure the effectiveness of design standards for
tethering systems and their ability to cope with large flood events.
There is value in understanding if dislodged pontoons and infrastructure predate the 2017
requirements.
State’s CPMR requirements can be overridden by local government planning scheme
requirements where planning scheme requirements are more stringent. Further information for
local governments to help with compliance and best practice standards is needed.
The DES coastal branch is exploring review of the current processes which allow the rebuilding of
2022 flood-damaged pontoons and structures without new DA requirements but incorporating the
CPMR 2017 standard requirements.
DES has a dedicated Pollution Hotline and funding available for clean-up activities. For more
information and to report pollution incidents by phone, online or by email please see
https://www.gld.gov.au/environment/management/pollution-
management/reporting#:~:text=Phone day%2C%207%20days%20a%20week.
Discussion:
MSQ is in the process of reviewing pontoon building materials, potentially improving on the
standard of wrapping of polystyrene to prevent pontoons from breaking apart.
Concern about pontoon design guidelines and discussion about a standard regulation on keel
shaped design and size to reduce drag. After the 2011 Brisbane River flood, ferry wharves were
constructed in a shape similar to a ship keel and survived well. Both shape and angle to flow
affects how the tethering system withstands flood events, both factors are being considered.
Pontoons escaped due to both tether failure in flood (break, float off piles) and debris smashing
into other pontoons, boats, and infrastructure.
It may be possible to identify pontoon ownership through insurance claims, with opportunity to
ensure the pontoon owner keeps the pontoon maintained within the standard. DES explained the
difficulty involved in gathering proper evidence on standard compliance.
MSQ plan to hold a series of workshops involving industry and manufacturers to review standards,
including inclusion of a robust pontoon identification plate. This will require inspections and
maintenance and regulation enforcement for insurance compliance requirements. It may be
possible to link pontoon IDs with insurance requirements.
Minutes - Polystyrene Round Table - 21 July 2022 Page 6
Page 58 of 63See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.