07/2323 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2323

(NTEGR)

 

ATED PLANNING ACT 1997 (OAG Assessment Checklist, Version 21,0, 3 September 2007
(No
tf no, is any ERA an Item 20 ERA {extracting rock or other material) intended to be located outside
waters? .

oO No - Uniess the application is consistent with any property developntent plan applying to the land, and the
application is accompented by an allocation nolico, tho Assessment Manager must refuse (0 recelva it.
i{Compiete Past G} This appication requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the
purposes af both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wiki Rivars Act 2005. if the
Administering Authonty is not the Assessment Manager lor tre appiication, the agency has jurisdiction
as Concurrence Agency.

OO Yes
If yes, does the ERA meet the folowing?

© the activity is located Inside a flood management areaanda [CJNo []) Yes
borrow pit of not more than 10,000m? for - .

« specified works under the Wid Rivers Act 2005, or

« residential complexes, as defined under the
Environmental Protection Act 1904

© the activity is located outside a flood management area ON (Yes

i yes fo either = Uniess the appficalion is consistent witn any property development plan applying (0 the
fond, and the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, te Assessinent Manager
must refuse to recive t. {Complete Part G) This eppiication requires assessment by the
Administering Authority tor the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994
and, subject to the relevant declaration for the wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2008. Hf
the Administering Authority Is not te Assessment Manager for tha application, the agency
has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency,

Hf rea to both - An appication for the ERA would be taken fo be not proparty made and the Assessinert
manager must refuse fo receive it.

  

 

WITH

IN THE LIMITS OF A PORT

 

14

Ig any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1004?

5 No
Yes

Ityes, is that part of the premises befow high water mark?

QO No .

(Yes - !f answers to questions in other sections of this checktst indicate that the proposed development is assessable under (PA,
schedule &- Ansvear (a} fo (c} below. This eppication requires assessment by the Port Authortty for the land. I you
answer no to (a), (b) and (c) below, (he Port Authority far the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

(a) _ Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?
O) No ,
(1) Yes - The Port Authority for the Part has jurisdiction as Cancurrence Agency.

(b) Is eny part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or
spoil grounds?
O No
DD Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

(c) Is any part of the proposaf within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?
O No

[Yes - te Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agenty.

 

 

 

 

6 2 WA 2 seme Hand