Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

07/2323 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2323

of 64

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1907 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 24.0, 3 September 2007

TIDAL WORK; WILD RIVER AREA

 

4.10

 

Is any of the proposed operational work tidal work, other than excluded work defined under the IPA?
&) No

[} Yes = Ansivor (a) ant () below

 

(a) lt any of the proposed tidal work prescribed tka! work?
CO) Yes
(f yes, is any of the proposad prescribed tidal work to be carried out in a wild river area declared under the Wid
Rivers Act 20057 .
O No
lf no, is the work proposed in a canal?
O No

If no, Is any of the proposed fidal work for a marina with more than 6 vessel berths?

0) No~;Compinto Part F). if the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA} is not the Assessment Manager for
the appiication, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. The application also requires
assessment by Queensland Transport (Maritime Safety Qk) as Concurrence Agency.

oO Yes « (Complata Part P), tthe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is not tha Assessment Manager

for the appkeation, ine agency has jurisdiction as Covtetrrence Agency. Tha appiication also
Toquiras assessment by Queensiend Transport (Martine Safety Qld) as Concurrence Agency and
Qid Fire and Rescue Service as Advice Agency.
CL] Yes
. (Fyes, Is any of the proposed tidal work for a marina with more than 6 vassel berths?

[1] No - (Compire Pert P), This application must be referred to Queensiand Transport {Maritime Safety Old)
&$ Concurrence Agancy, .

(Yes - (Complete Port 4. This applicatian must be referred fo Queansland Transport (Maritime Safely Od)
as Concurrence Agency and ON Fire and Rescue Service as Advico Agency.

C) Yes
iFyes, Is ell of the proposed prescribed tidal work for specified works under the Wik Rivers Act 2005?
(2) No- An application for the operational work would bo taken to be met properly mada and tho Assassurent
Manager must refuse to receive it.

OG Yes

Hyes, is the work proposed in a canal?

O No .

If no, Is any of the proposed tidal work for 8. marina with mora than 6 vessel berths?

1 No- Unless tha application is consistent with any property development plan applyiitg fo the land,
the Assassitent Manager must rotuse to receive it (Complete Part P) If the Environmental
Protection Agenty (EPA) is not the Assessment Manager for the anpkeation, the agancy has
Jurisdiction as Coneumence Agency. The appiication atso mquires assessment by
Queensland Transport (Maritime Safaty Qid) as Concurrence Agency and assessment for
the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2008.

C1 Yes= Uniess the application is consistent with any property devolopmant plan applying to the
land, the Assessnient Managar must refuse to receive ft (Complete Pait P) if the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is rtot the Assessment Manager for ho
application, ihe agency has jurisdiction ag Concurrence Aganty. The éppheation also
requires assessment by Queensiand Transport (Martine Safoty Qid) as Concurrence
Agency and ON Fire and Rescue Service as Advice Agoncy, Subject to the decieration for
the relevant wild river area, the application also requires assessment for the purposes of
the Wik Rivers Act 2005. .

CJ Yes

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2323 - MCU - Detached House [As Published].pdf · 3.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.