Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Peter G Rayment - MCU25/0118
To: Assessment Manager- Noosa Shire Council Date: 7^/11/25
Re: Application Number MCU25/0118
Description: Development Permit for Material Change of Use by Coast2Bay for Multiple
Dwellings - Affordable Rental Premises 25 X small dwellings plus one community room
dwelling.
Site Address: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy Qld 4563 on Lot 2 (part) SP348613
I make the following submission to Council and request the above mentioned
application be recommended for refusal on the following grounds:
1. The proposed medium-density residential development departs significantly from
the Community Facilities - cemetery intent, so undermining the purpose of this
zoningand eroding the strategic basisfor community facilities land.
2. Such a departure would set an undesirable precedent for other Community
Facilities zoned lands, weakening protection for important community
infrastructure.
3. The development is out of scale with the low-density residential context that
surrounds the site. Approving medium-density housing would erode local
character, reduce amenity for existing residents, and create a form that is
inconsistent with the Cooroy Loval Plan’s vision.
4. The proposed built form is disproportionate to adjacent properties. Such over scale
development would likely lead to a severe change in character for the
neighbourhood.
5. While social and affordable housing is clearly needed, the Noosa Plan does not
support concentration of socially-oriented housing on lands zoned for Community
Facilities, particularly when removed from core services. The Plan’s Housing
Strategy (as reflected in recent amendments) anticipates that affordable and
social housing be integrated within the community, not isolated in a large single
development. The location is beyond acceptable distances from Cooroy’s town
centre, shops, public transport and services - exacerbating social isolation,
transport burden, and inequitable access for future residents.
6. Dianella Court, the primary access road, is designed for very limited residential
traffic (servicing only 28 dwellings). A development using Dianella Court for access
will generate far greater traffic, parking pressure and turning movements than the
road network was designed to accommodate, posing safety risks and reducing
amenity for existing local residents.
7. If lands intended for social and community infrastructure are converted to
residential developments, it undermines the Council’s ability to deliver genuine
community facilities in the future. This sets a dangerous precedent; other parcels
zoned for community use may similarly be targeted for housing, diluting their
original purpose and undermining the long-term planning objectives.
Conclusion
• The proposed development is contrary to the long term zoning intent for the
site.
It fails to respect the local character of this area of Cooroy and is
J
.disproportionate in scale, density and impacts. r
'03
202J A>,
OJ
i ohom CD
Noosa Cour.c«
\ Counts- X
<ZrrrK>y 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
• Approving such a development would undermine future community
infrastructure, risk social segregation, and put additional burden on local roads
and amenity.
Therefore, I request that the Council refuse the application.
Name: 7?^
Signature:
Address: ^(/^YS 77 A//? ri
Email (optional)
Used in these records
PM Submission - Peter G Rayment - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.