Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

09/0986 - Preliminary Building Approval [As Published] · 172009.986

of 22

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT. ACTIITY; WILD-RIVERAREA (continued) 4

itl

   

 

PA schedule 8, part 1, table 2, item 1; IPA, schedule 8 part 1,.table 5, tems 3 and 4: IP Regutalion, schedule 2, table 2, tems 1 and 23; Environmental Protection Act 1994, section 73AA (wild

Ifno, is any ERA an extraction ERA intended to be located outside waters?

oO No — Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying fo the land, and the application is accompanied by
an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Form 1, Part G}. This application requires
assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act
2005. if the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agency.

(Yes

tyes, does the ERA meetthe following? we

(i) the-activity is located inside a flood management area and a borrow pit of not

more than 10,000m* for -

«Specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005; of
+ residential complexes, as defined under the Environmental Protection Act 1994

(ii) _ the activity is located outside 4 flood management area ; _ }[1No} C1 Yes}

 

Yes ;

 

 

 

 

 

 

if yes to either (i) or (ii) above - Uniess the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, and
the application is accompanied by an ‘allocation notice, te Asséssmént Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Form 1,
Part G). This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental
Protection Act 1994 and, subject to the declaration for the relevant wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2008, if the Administering
Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

{f no to both (i) and (ii) above - An application for the ERA will be taken fo be not properly made and the Assessment manager must
, : : refuse to'receive it.

iver area}; Wild Rivers Act 2005, section 43A: relevant wild river declaration: Wild Rivers Code,

 

F WITHIN THE LIMITS OFA PORT Sist28"2s:

 
  

re eT ee

 

 

14

 

|s apy part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
[A No - Goto Q1.5 0 Yes

If yes, is that part of the premises below high water mark?

CINo

{C] Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8 — Answer (a) to (c) bélow. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority for the land. {f you answer no to (a), (b) and
(c) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency. :
(a) _ Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?
oe oO No io) Yes — The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. .
(b) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds?
(CINo D1 Yes - the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. :
(c) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?
. CINo (1 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

 

IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 2, tems 15 and 16,

 

[DECI

 

    
 

        

Parry Cr

   
 

 

s

 

ED FISH:HABITAT AREA ; 3

 

15

 

 

PAN any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?

No - Goto 01.6

(7 Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8,
this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). If DPIGF is not the Assessment

Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

 

 

 

IP Regulation, schedule 2, lable 2, item 26. . . .

 

Page 4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.5 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

09_0986 - Preliminary Building Approval [As Published].pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.