Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 4 - Planning Scheme Code Responses
Table 6.8.3.3 - Criteria for assessment
Role and function Table 6.8.3.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
Role and function
PO1 No changes to existing uses on the properties as part of
Land uses in the Rural zone are limited to those No acceptable outcome provided. this development
which are compatible with agriculture and the
protection of environmental and landscape
values.
PO2 AO2.1 AO2.1
Development does not result in the loss or Development that is incompatible with N/A – boundary realignment only
diminished productive capacity of Agricultural agricultural activities is not located on Agricultural
Land Conservation Area. Land Conservation Area and an adequate
separation area between the development and
Editor’s Note—Agricultural Land Conservation the Agricultural Land Conservation Area is
Areas are shown on the Agricultural provided.
Land Overlay Maps in Schedule 2
AO2.2 AO2.2
Where there is an overriding need for N/A – boundary realignment only
incompatible development to be located
on Agricultural Land Conservation Area, the
development does not have an irreversible
impact on the productive capacity of Agricultural
Land Conservation Area.
Editor’s Notes—
An irreversible impact on agricultural land
Appendix 4 – Planning Scheme Code Responses
Reconfiguring of a Lot – Boundary Realignment (2 Lots into 2 Lots)
51 Hamersley Lane, Lake Macdonald – Lot 5 RP203483
81 Hamersley Lane, Lake Macdonald – Lot 6 RP203483
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.