Original source · versioned page text
2021-07-06 S&O Agenda - Item 11 - Attachment 2 - Noosa Cycling and Walking Strategy and Implementation Plan
The original of this document is very large (28.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Planning the bike riding and walking network
Network planning Hierarchy Description/ Function
The bike riding and walking network plans provide the Principal transport
“blueprints” to identify how routes across Noosa are Routes connecting higher order destinations such
intended to function and link together. These plans have as town centres, employment hubs, public transport,
been developed considering: major sport and recreation facilities, major tourist
• Key characteristics of typical bike riding and walking attractors and adjacent local government areas.
user groups, including vulnerable, families, commuters Asset management plan hierarchy level 1.
and recreation/sports users. Principal recreation
• Distances people are typically willing to walk to reach Scenic, high quality recreation routes of regional
certain types of destinations. For example, up to significance such as along the Noosa River route and
~400m to access local facilities and up to ~1,200m to the coastal pathway.
access regional facilities and the time it takes people
to cycle a typical trip distance (e.g. 2km: ~6mins, 3km:
~9mins, 5km: ~15mins). These travel times could be
T Asset management plan hierarchy level 1.
Secondary transport
Routes connecting lower order destinations such as
AF
vastly improved if using an e-bike, which results in local centres, schools, district sport and recreation
larger areas being potentially accessible by bike. parks.
• Improving access to the 16 centres identified in Noosa Asset management plan hierarchy level 2.
Plan 2020 including Noosa Junction, Cooroy, Tewantin
and Pomona, as well as other major attractors such
Secondary recreation
as sport and recreation facilities, community facilities, Longer distance routes targeted at confident/sports
R
schools and tourist destinations. cyclists for training and recreation.
• Achieving the bike riding and walking related Asset management plan hierarchy level 2.
objectives identified in the Noosa Plan 2020 and Local
D
Plan codes.
Local
• Improving connectivity to existing bike riding and Routes connecting local destinations such as
walking trails and trail heads. neighbourhood/residential centres, parks and
community facilities. These are also used for
recreational purposes.
Asset management plan hierarchy level 3/4.
Bike riding network plan
Trail
Lower order recreation routes used by mountain
Hierarchy
bike riders (and often bush-walkers/hikers). They are
A bike riding route hierarchy was developed to assist typically gravel or sand tracks.
in defining standards and desirable management
characteristics across the network. Table 11 presents the
bike riding network hierarchy categories and definitions. Trail connector
Routes which connect to trail heads, could require
low standard infrastructure (eg a gravel track).
Table 12: Bike riding hierarchy
28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.