Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 JUNE 2021
Submission Topic Detail
It goes without saying that the consumer price index over the 12 months to March 2021
during that quarter rows by 1.1% what you are proposing is significantly in excess of
this. Please can you provide your justification for such an increase?
It is difficult to understand the basis or justification for such an increase particularly
when Holiday left properties which are periodically occupied on any of you must use
less council infrastructure than those that our owner occupied full-time
In addition it is our experience that holiday property guests generally are relatively small
uses of council services and the significant economic benefit bought to the region by
visitors cannot be underestimated and surely must underpinned one of the reasons
why Noosa has become such a popular, dynamic and favoured destination for people
from all over Australia.
In addition we have like many other sectors in the community suffered in relation to
Covid and ongoing border restrictions that have caused financial hardship to the
tourism sector and unsurprisingly Noosa has not been spared from this problem.
Indeed it’s ongoing at the moment as we have had a number of cancellations for rentals
for people from Melbourne so there has been a significant loss of income over the last
15 months also that the pandemic has persisted.
In these conditions it’s difficult to justify any kind of increase let alone one of the
magnitude of what is being proposed here. Why are you penalising holiday let property
owners when they have already suffered income loss and by virtue of being property
owners provide significant economic benefit to the Noosa region.
I am at a loss to understand the basis of a justification for such an extraordinary
increase way beyond the CPI and at a time when many property owners are reliant on
income to support families during a time when the pandemic affects still have a
significant impact across the community
Could you please reconsider this decision on any view it’s difficult to find justification
for such an extraordinary increase. Finally could you please answer the questions
posed above?
Submission 5:
I think the change to rates for STL properties is necessary as Tourism is becoming all
consuming in Noosa and strangling the local community and residents. Currently it’s
inequitable that residents carry the costs for promoting tourism ( Noosa does not
require any more advertising) as well as the added pressure on infrastructure by the
tourists and the inconvenience of STL in residential areas. I am hopeful that in the
future the home businesses will be treated more fairly and compete on a level playing
field with hotels, reports and unit blocks.
Submission 6:
We want to emphatically state our opposition to the proposed rate changes proposed
by Noosa Council. Of particular concern is the singling out of completely unfair and
disproportionate increases to any resident who participates in providing any home
hosted accommodation – ie. renting out a room in their home. Putting in place a
separate PPR with home hosted short term stay categorisation is discriminatory in the
extreme. There is no extra charge for PPR who also have a home based business
(under which home hosted currently resides and should remain) or for PPR who have
boarders or lodgers stay. There is also no limit or additional charge on the number of
family members or other people who can stay in a residence. However for residents
who rent out a room for 1 or 2 short term guests they are accused of using excessive
additional council resources and infrastructure. This is pure fiction. I could have several
additional family members or paying tenants staying in my home with me and there is
no additional charge levied but for us 2 residents with 1 to 2 guests in our home for just
some of the time, we are now supposed to believe we are extraordinary users of council
resources.
Page 22 of 47
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.