Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 JUNE 2021
Submission Topic Detail
would actually like to suggest that some funds be allocated directly to the Noosa
Wedding Organization to use for the promotion of weddings in Noosa and the Noosa
Hinterland.
Submission 5:
We thank you for the opportunity to provide Budget feedback. We congratulate the
Noosa Council staff & councillors on preparing a budget that forecasts a minimal
General Rate increase only, especially in times with Inflationary pressures evident. As
significant contributors to the Tourism & Economic Development Levy we do wish
however to express our concern of the proposed changes in this area. We are strong
supporters of Mel Anderson and her team and we would like to stress the importance
of providing support & job security to Mel and her key staff. While Noosa may currently
be experiencing record tourism revenue, it is without question when International
Travel returns, regions so reliant on domestic travel, such as Noosa, will experience a
significant decline. The need to be proactive, maintaining a strong brand and
experienced team in both marketing & promotion and destination management will be
critical to the ongoing economic development & employment within the Shire.
Submission 6:
Our recommendation is that Council does not change the levy in this financial budget,
but have proper evidence-based reporting and consultation to fully review Council's
motives to remove it and the impact on our industry. Our wish is that the council gives
additional financial support to Tourism Noosa
Submission 7:
I write as an individual ratepayer, former Noosa Councillor under Mayor Bob Abbott at
the time of introduction of the Tourism Levy over two decades ago, and member of the
inaugural Noosa Tourism Board. I am simply horrified and saddened that the draft
Budget proposes to eliminate the Tourism and Economic Development Levy, which
over two decades has underpinned an extraordinary partnership between Council and
the tourism sector.. I urge councillors to reinstate the Tourism and Economic
Development Levy. My concerns are as follows:
1) At the time of their election, not a single councillor flagged that he or she intended
to eliminate the Tourism and Economic Development Levy if elected.. All emphasized
the importance of sustainable economic development for the shire. Yet in a little over
12 months from the election, this proposal, with all its flaws, has come onto the table.
2) This is a change of extraordinary magnitude for the tourism industry, yet it has been
introduced at the last minute almost as an afterthought, with no consultation with the
industry and no prior warning in the first round of budget community consultation. This
casual attitude to the major employer in the shire could almost be perceived as arrogant
and is particularly offensive given the COVID challenges that the industry has faced in
the past 12 months.. It would appear that a multi-million dollar industry has been thrown
into disarray without serious thought being given by Council to the consequences of
the proposal.
3) The proposed change exhibits no understanding or valuing of the extraordinary and
innovative partnership which has been nurtured by previous Councils and Tourism
Noosa over two decades. It was the tourism industry which approached the Abbot
council, seeking the levy as a way of building a sustainable tourism industry enabling
certainty in investment. A partnership emerged in which Council collected and
disbursed funds while fulfilling an overall quality control role on behalf of its community.
Council has always had a role in oversighting the direction of the tourism sector through
requiring a strategic plan outlining the proposed direction of Tourism Noosa.
4) The change from collecting funds via a levy versus bundling them up in general rates
has enormous significance, since the Local Government Act specifically requires that
levy funds be used for the purpose described in the Budget documents. Funds
collected via general rates go into general revenue and have no such protection. No
reason has been given for the proposed change. The tourism levy normally raises in
the order of $3M, of which $2.52M is proposed for tourism promotion.
Council is asking the tourism sector to trust them and believe that the same funds will
be disbursed in the future. In effect, Council is proposing to turn an equal partner into
Page 28 of 47
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.