Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 JUNE 2021
Submission Topic Detail
Noosa Council would do well to concentrate on its true core business. Basic items,
such as maintaining a supply of dog bags along Gympie Terrace, recycling bins for
Cooroy, roundabouts for Cooroy, sealing unsealed roads, and the Noosa Waters
fountain which has sat as an eyesore for well over a year. A Council that can't manage
such minor issues should most definitely not be involved in a $1.2 billion + business
that it clealy doesn't understand
Submission 53
As a member of Tourism Noosa I wish to register my feedback and questions in
response to the 21-22 Draft Budget as follows: The proposal to bring the Tourism and
Economic Development Levy under General Rates is alarming for the tourism industry.
Where will we see the current transparency around how our Tourism Levy funds are
used, as we do in Tourism Noosa's Annual Reports? With protection removed, there is
no guarantee that Council or future Councils will continue to use the funds for their
purpose, or will even fund Tourism Noosa for the purpose of tourism promotion. In this
uncertain Covid world, now more than ever before our tourism industry needs security
and the continued good work of Tourism Noosa. Surely a consultative approach with
Tourism Noosa, it’s stakeholders and members is the best way forward in order to
resolve funding issues.
Submission 54
I object to the proposal to move funds collected through the Tourism & Economic
Development Levy into General Rates and completely reject Council’s statement that
“tourism promotion has evolved into core Council business”. I request that Council
removes this proposal from the Draft Budget and gives one of our Shire’s biggest
industries – a $1BILLION+ industry (Tourism Research Australia figures 2019) – the
courtesy of an explanation and the chance to discuss its potential impacts and
ramifications. When did tourism evolve into core Council business? If that was the
case:
Why has Council been funding Tourism Noosa to carry out destination promotion
for 20 years?
Why has Tourism Noosa had to receive Council approval for the Annual Reports,
annual budgets and strategic plans and also present twice-yearly activity reports?
What tourism promotion does Council carry out as “core business”? Until Council can
provide evidence of this and rationale for removing the current protection provided by
this special levy that ensures the funds are used for destination promotion, this
proposal should be dropped. Don’t just give a stock answer to the people who have
provided feedback to this “consultation” (which I would’ve thought was a 2-way process
but there’s been nothing from Council in the way of explanation). The tourism industry;
Tourism Noosa, its 900+ member businesses, staff and Board; the levy payers and the
Noosa community, many of whom indirectly benefit economically from tourism, all
deserve to hear Council’s side of the “consultation”. It is not provided in your Budget
papers.
How can legitimate feedback be provided to Council on something to which there is no
rationale, no explanation? What has suddenly changed after 20 years? What have
Tourism Noosa and the local tourism industry (the Shire’s largest employment sector)
done to deserve having this change forced on them without the courtesy of one iota of
explanation or discussion of the implications? Council has a representative on the
Tourism Noosa Board – was the proposal mentioned to the Board? Where was the
discussion about this extraordinarily significant change as an election issue last year?
There was none.
There are so many questions that Council has not addressed that this proposal is an
insult to levy payers, the Noosa community and the tourism industry, particularly as
they face great challenges and uncertainty due to Covid. What guarantees can Council
give the Tourism Levy rate payers that the levy funds, if bundled into General Rates,
will continue to be used for their intended purpose, i.e. destination promotion which
Page 41 of 47
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.