Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 JUNE 2021
Submission Topic Detail
Please reconsider this change which seems to be an approach that should be subject
to deeper consideration and evaluation rather than a change creeping in under a draft
Budget cycle. There is an absolute track record of the succcess of the Special Rate
approach since 2001 so any changes should be carefully evaluated.
Submission 59
As the former head of Marketing and Deputy CEO of Tourism Noosa, with over 25
years experience working in tourism strategy and marketing across various states in
Australia and first-hand insight into successful working models for tourism at all levels,
I am compelled to express concerns regarding Noosa Council’s proposed changes to
the Tourism and Economic Development Levy and the potential loss to the local
tourism industry of what is regarded as a leading model for tourism prosperity in
regional areas.
During the time of my tenure and beyond, local and regional tourism organisations from
across Australia and beyond frequently sought the advice of Tourism Noosa as to how
best to structure their operations, from marketing and governance to membership
engagement and sustainability approaches. Core to this reputation and achievement
that countless tourism regions envy is the levy model and productive collaboration with
a supportive Council.
As a levy driven from the ground up by local Noosa businesses, the funding enables a
well-planned and proactive suite of work, spanning brand and tactical marketing,
research program, tourism event funding, sustainability initiatives, consumer
communications, international marketing, local visitor information services and much
more to be delivered on behalf of all local business operators.
Protection of this levy and critical funding for one of Noosa’s most significant economic
generators must be strongly considered for the benefit of not only the countless local
businesses that rely on tourism, but to also protect the billion dollar plus economic
impact that Tourism Noosa has nurtured over many years of strategic marketing and
management.
The statement that "Tourism promotion has evolved into core Council business” is
alarming - tourism promotion has sat with Tourism Noosa for 20 years, an organisation
that has professionally, transparently and strategically promoted the destination with
great success. Further, in my experience working and liaising with a wide range of local
and regional tourism organisations, tourism that is managed independently from
Council, but with the strong partnership of Council, is a model best designed for
ongoing success and private sector business industry engagement.
I urge Noosa Council to maintain the current Tourism Levy structure and continue to
fund Tourism Noosa's operations well into the future.
Submission 60
We strongly object to proposed changes to the Tourism Levy, as outlined in the draft
Budget papers. We also strongly disagree with the statement that “Tourism promotion
has evolved into core Council business”.
Tourism promotion has sat with Tourism Noosa for 20 years, an organisation that
professionally, transparently and strategically promotes the Noosa destination, with
great success. Our increasing visitor spend (reaching a record $1.2 billion in the
months before COVID) and the recent Queensland’s Top Tourism Town Award
(Tourism Noosa’s submission) are 2 recent examples.
We urge you to maintain the current Tourism Levy structure and continue to fund
Tourism Noosa’s operations for at the next 12 months. Any future changes should be
made based on proper evidence based reporting and consultation to fully review
Council’s motives to remove the levy and the impact on Noosa’s tourism industry
including its tourism promotion.
Page 44 of 47
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.