Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - OPW23 0189
Project No. PG-10899 Page | 2 November 2023 Ref: PG-10899, 2023-10-16, ASR VER 3 DD Sunnyside CD Sunnyside Pty Ltd – Acid Sulfate Soil Investigation - Proposed Residence, 30 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 2.0 METHODOLOGY The investigation comprised the drilling and sampling of one (1) boreholes to a depth of 9.0m, using a Compac 018 drilling rig fitted with 100mm solid flight augers, and one (1) hand auger across the proposed building area. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) testing was conducted adjacent to the boreholes. The deeper borehole was sampled for Acid Sulfate purposes, in addition to geotechnical sampling. Additional borehole drilling and testing will be required when access to the remainder of the site becomes available. The boreholes were located by an experienced geotechnical engineer with reference to the site features and locations were recorded. At the completion of the drilling, the holes were checked for groundwater intrusion and then backfilled. The soil classification descriptions and field tests were carried out in general accordance with Australian Standards. AS 1726 Geotechnical Site Investigations QASSIT Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Investigation Team Dept. of Natural Resources, 'Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) in Queensland, 1998' (Oct. 1998, Revision 4.0). NOOSA COUNCIL 'SC6.9.3 Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) Investigation and management plan QUEENSLAND State Planning Policy Guideline, December GOVERNMENT 2013, Acid Sulfate Soils Borehole records, Dynamic Cone Penetrometer test results and a site plan showing the test locations are appended to the report. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site of the proposed development is located at 30 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads. The site was bordered by Mossman Court to the south, existing residences to the east and west, and a canal to the north. At the time of the investigation, the site was occupied by an existing two storey residence and detach single garage. The site was relatively level and drainage was considered poor to fair. Refer following aerial and site photographs for typical site conditions.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.