Council archive · source document
Appendix 7. Flora Assessment [As Published] · 132007.2399
Flora Assessment
Noosa Springs Development Precinct J
for StarCo Developments Pty Ltd
4.2 RECORDED VEGETATION COMMUNITIES vegetation under the provisions of the VMA. A
brief description of each vegetation community
Five (5) distinct vegetation communities were is provided in Table 4.1, while a more
identified within the subject area, as shown on comprehensive description of the nature,
Figure 4.2. All of these vegetation composition and distribution of these
communities are considered non-remnant as communities is provided in the following
they are either too small or too disturbed to be sections.
consistent with the definition of remnant
Table 4.1 Vegetation communities present within the subject area
Vegetation Description Dominant Canopy Species
Community
1 Open Forest /Woodland Melaleuca quinquenervia, Lophostemon suaveolens, Acacia sp.
(Height: 10-12m)
2 Open forest Eucalyptus tereticornis, Eucalyptus robusta, Eucalyptus propinqua,
(Height: 10-15m) Eucalyptus siderophloia, Lophostemon suaveolens, Acacia sp.
3 Low open/closed Cynodon dactylon, Paspalum dilatatum, Chloris gayana, Melinis repens,
grassland (Height: 0.1-
0.5m)
4 Open forest (Height: 3- Waterhousea floribunda, Cupaniopsis anacardioides, Xanthostemon
8m) chrysanthus, Syzygium australe.
5 Plantation Areas (Height: Native and exotic Palm species
2-15m)
Community 1: Open forest/woodland (Height: Community 2 is located within the southern
10-12m) portion of the property and consists of two
polygons (Figure 4.1). Dominant canopy
Community 1 is located with the southern, species within this community included
eastern and western portions of the property Eucalyptus tereticornis, Eucalyptus robusta,
(Figure 4.1). This community was dominated Eucalyptus propinqua, Eucalyptus siderophloia
by Melaleuca quinquenervia and Lophostemon and Lophostemon suaveolens.
suaveolens.
This mid storey of this community was
The mid and lower strata of this area were generally well vegetated and consisted of
dominated by Elaeocarpus reticulatus, Acacia shrubs including Acacia sp., Austromyrtus
species and Lophostemon suaveolens dulcis, Smilax australis and Dodonaea
regrowth. triquetra. The under storey was generally
sparse as a result of an accumulation of
The ground stratum was dominated by native material, although some native forbs and
grasses, forbs and shrubs, including Blechnum grasses were present. Exotic species were
indica and other wet heath species. Exotic generally poorly represented within this
species were well represented within this community.
community species listed under the Land
Protection (Pest and Stock Route Due to the relatively small canopy height of
Management) Act (LPA) (2002) (i.e. Baccharis this community, it does not fulfil the definition
halimifolia) were present. of remnant under the VMA and is therefore not
mapped as an RE.
This community is analogous to RE 12.2.7 in
terms of species composition. However, due Community 3: Low open/closed grassland
to the relatively low canopy height, it does not (Height: 0.1-0.5m).
fulfil the definition of remnant under the VMA.
Community 3 is located throughout the
Community 2: Open forest (Height: 10-15m). southern portion of the site (Figure 4.1).
BAAM Pty Ltd Page 5
File No: 0105-002 Version 0
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix 7. Flora Assessment [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 657 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.