Council archive · source document
DEEDI Approval to request to change and existing development approval · OPW11/0116
NOTES
1. Design conditions
1.1. Tides [QT tide tables, Noosa Head]
AHD LAT
HAT +1.06m +2.18m
Sand-filled Geotextile Containers
MHWS +0.62m +1.74m
Finished dimensions
AHD +0.00m +1.12m
[Filled above water level]
MLWS -0.80m +0.32m
LAT -1.12m +0.00m
1.2. Flood [Noosa River Flood Study, John Wilson & Partners, 1995]
50yr ARI 1.44mAHD 3.8m
entrance scour 0.5m
Nominal Diameter = 3.Om
1.3. Currents [GCCM numerical model]
1.3m
Max spring tide 1 -1.5m/s. Volume = 81 m3
Velocities expected to vary in response to prevailing channel configurations and location within
the estuary.
1.4. Waves
Hs 1 m [nominal] 4m
Potential wave conditions at the foreshore are expected to vary in
response to prevailing channel configurations. Nominal Diameter = 3.4m
1.5m
Volume =103m3
2. Materials - Geotextile and Sand-filled Geotextile Mega-Containers
2.1. Containers to be fabricated using ELCOMax 1209RP geotextile (or equivalent). Expected lifetime
25 years.
2.2. Container length to be 20m [may be altered if necessary or preferred by contractor].
2.3. Containers to have suitably spaced filling ports [MIN 3 preferred] with "screw & glue" closure types. 5m
2.4. Geotextile underlay to be ELCOMax 60OR (or equivalent)
2.5. Geotextile flaps, where required, are to be of sufficient size to provide a 30m x 6m flap. Flaps are to
be fabricated using ELCOMax 60OR (or equivalent). Flaps are to be adequately secured (e.g. Nominal Diameter = 4.2m
stiched) to the bottom of the container. Volume =183m3 T3 2.Om
2.6. If flaps cannot be fabricated, may be replaced with separate geotextile fabric with 1 m laps.
3. Filling of Containers
3.1. Excavation tolerances 6m
Vertical +l- 0.2m
3.2. Containers to be filled in accordance with manufacturer's specifications using either jetpump, dredge
or suitable alternative.
Nominal Diameter = 4.6m
3.3.
3.4.
Design filled container dimensions as shown.
Finished container tolerances Volume = 224m3 T4 2,2m
Horizontal +1.1.0m from design alignment [containers to be well butted together]
Vertical +l- 0.5m at any single point
+l 0.3m averaged over 10m
_t. Maintenance
4.1. Nominated geotextile is more robust than the standard geotextile, however may be subject to Sand-filled Geotextile Containers *.I 1 rfu Lunv: Ar,..,
damage from vandalism, vessel impact, anchors etc. Finished dimensions
[Filled below water level] 6m
4.2. Structures to be inspected periodically and after all major events.
4.3. Any minor damage is to be repaired as soon as practicable.
4.4. Any major damage or deflation and the container is to be replaced.
4.5. If damage is an ongoing concern, consideration may need to be given to armouring the structures
Nominal Diameter = 4.6m
[e.g. with rock]. 2.6m
4.6. Scour may require topping up with additional containers or placing of rock in scour holes
International
5. Monitoring
5.1. The natural system is highly variable. Monitoring is to be undertaken in accordance with ICM Report Coastal
"Option Review - Noosa River Spit" to determine the performance and Impacts of the works. Management
5.2. Works may be modified or removed if monitoring indicates that this is necessary. '
,i mi SYC Males t$ WS:1, 4211,01D 'W,*
: S , 3u',MM'&wYIPo sah8-1,0.04 17 Arch
5.3. Implementation of later stages of the works to be undertaken as required. Flap Detail
NOOSA RIVER SPIT
NOTES
NHS-011 B
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
DEEDI Approval to request to change and existing development approvalRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.