PM Submission Object - Mervyn Hyde - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

Document Set ID: 20307680
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017


[OCR of page images]
Document Set ID: 20307680
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017

Notice of Submission under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009

To: Noosa Council: — [email protected]
Attention: Patrick Murphy, Assessment Manager

Lodge by 26 April 2017

‘Fle No MCU16/0153 aie i
Postal address of Land (as advertised): 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach Sine
Nature of Proposed Development: Material Change Of Use - Multiple housing Type 4 Conventional and Visitor
Accommodation Type 4 Conventional

2. Submitter details MUST BE COMPLETED

Date of submissions <2 Ss (4, t

Fullname of Submitter: Dy MER. oe. hide

Postal address: 3 PAN RW PALMAE

Suburb PELE YAH SPRINKS state GLO Postcode: Li 5} 3,

Signature(s)
‘Sms areas tspea ine Note ot submsson secroncdin, /ABY/ i

3. Details of Submission ee
1 (We), make the following submission OBJECTING to the Development Proposal MCU16/0153:

1, The proposed development is located in the Open Space Recreation Zone and does not comply with
the Noosa Plan (October 2016). There are no public interest grounds to justify approval,

2. The proposed development ignores Noosa Plan requirements for low density, low impact housing and
with houses priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal does not provide suitably priced
accommodation for the needs of the local community and conflicts with the existing and desired public
amenity, open space and village lifestyle.

3. On the western side, the development’s impact on Rufous Creek and the wetland, both during
construction and upon completion is of great concern, as is the planned density of housing in this
ecologically sensitive zone adjacent to Noosa National Park. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill
will be required, giving rise to 150 truck trips per day for at least 3 months along David Low Way, down
Sandpiper Court, through the IGA carpark and then back via the Heron St roundabout.

4. Greatly increased traffic and congestion is assured during construction and after completion as traffic
queues currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times and during
school and public holidays. The proposed development will cause serious additional congestion that
will be impossible to mitigate in the future, The proposal's Traffic Impact report mysteriously relies on
outdated development approvals and the old Noosa Planning Scheme, while ignoring the traffic to and
from the commercial premises (IGA. pharmacy etc).

5. The proposed development has a high density of buildings and infrastructure, with inadequate side
setbacks, inadequate vegetation and shade, and is not integrated with the natural site.

Additional Comments

| it necessary, use separate shee! of paper and attach)

To: Assessment Manager: Patrick [email protected] PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565
Murphy

As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, aif submissions, including individual detais, are pubWshed an Council's website and therefore
will be accessible fo intamet ssarch engines. All submissions are published, respective of whether or not they are properly made”