Original source · versioned page text
2016-04-26 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 16 of 19
OUR CUSTOMERS
Measure Measure
Number of requests received x month % of requests completed within target date x month
Purpose Purpose
Level of customer demand & whether service levels appropriate Indicator of whether service levels are satisfactory
1750 100%
1500 y\ f—™ i
NE pe’ 80% 7
1250 2 s
750 40% +—— : . =
500
20%
250
0 r r r r r Ly r Y t r r 1 0% r t r t 1 r r t r r r 1
\ RY O \
pr oo OF we of FF es yw ys? p> ot F Ww oe vi FP oF we ye sy”
Comment Comment
Measure Measure
Average seconds of wait time in phone queue % of planning applications decided within 20 business days
Purpose Purpose
Service timeliness / capacity to respond Service timeliness
a ——————_<“—“<“——
120 100%
80%
90 -
60%
60 + = F — :
40% -
30 | ~ a 7" 7 ft r 2 20% - - -
0 ‘ ‘ ‘ 0% r
Jan Feb March
s = ¥ of wv we ws ws ™MCU Reconfiguration Op Works Op Works (Veg) ™PBA mRAP wu Total
SS pe® eof oF ws! S <& SS ve
Comment
Of the 35 MCU applications decided, 28 were decided within the time frames.
4 Reconfiguration applications were decided within timeframes.
23 Op Works applications were decided, with 2 outside 20 days due to requests to delay payment of bonds.
29 Op Works (Veg) applications were decided.
6 PBA applications were decided.
For those RAP applications decided outside the time frame, changed plans were negotiated during the
decision period.
Benchmark is shown by red line, Previous year data Is shown by purple line
Page 16 of 19See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.