Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Info Request Response Traffic Management Plan 25-9-25 - JN1006_2-Bennett-3FergusonSt-AIA092025

of 33

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                                                                            [email protected]


Matrix 2

                                                         Landscape Significance
                                 1.   High        2. Moderate                3. Low

                                                                          Weed sp./
                                             Landscape significance                   Hazardous
                                                                          nuisance

                1.   Long – >
                     40 yrs

                2.   Medium
  Replacement
  Expectancy/




                     – 15-40
  Useful Life


  timeframe




                     yrs

                3.   Short - <
                     15 yrs

 Legend for matrix assessment

                High Retention Value – These trees should be retained and protected
                throughout the development. Ideally, the development should not impact
                these trees at all. Where impacts are identified, extensive protection
                measures should be put in place to ensure the trees remain viable post-
                construction.

                Medium Retention Value – These trees should be retained and protected
                throughout development where feasible. Options to mitigate impacts
                should be explored and undertaken where the cost of replacing the tree is
                greater than the cost of protecting the tree.

                Low Retention Value – These trees can be retained at the tree owner’s
                discretion. They would not normally warrant additional protection outside
                of site exclusion, although they may require protection under a DA or third-
                party property law.


Notes:
   1. Landscape Significance must first be decided using the Landscape Significance Flow
      Chart.
   2. The ULE/Replacement timeframe is whichever is greater of the two values.
      Replacement timeframe is the time it will take to replace the tree in the same
      environment like-for-like.




Tree Management Plan (TMP)                                                            Ref: JN0823
Log in to download the original file

Info Request Response Traffic Management Plan 25-9-25 - JN1006_2-Bennett-3FergusonSt-AIA092025.pdf · 4.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.