Original source · versioned page text
Info Request Response Traffic Management Plan 25-9-25 - JN1006_2-Bennett-3FergusonSt-AIA092025
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
[email protected]
Matrix 2
Landscape Significance
1. High 2. Moderate 3. Low
Weed sp./
Landscape significance Hazardous
nuisance
1. Long – >
40 yrs
2. Medium
Replacement
Expectancy/
– 15-40
Useful Life
timeframe
yrs
3. Short - <
15 yrs
Legend for matrix assessment
High Retention Value – These trees should be retained and protected
throughout the development. Ideally, the development should not impact
these trees at all. Where impacts are identified, extensive protection
measures should be put in place to ensure the trees remain viable post-
construction.
Medium Retention Value – These trees should be retained and protected
throughout development where feasible. Options to mitigate impacts
should be explored and undertaken where the cost of replacing the tree is
greater than the cost of protecting the tree.
Low Retention Value – These trees can be retained at the tree owner’s
discretion. They would not normally warrant additional protection outside
of site exclusion, although they may require protection under a DA or third-
party property law.
Notes:
1. Landscape Significance must first be decided using the Landscape Significance Flow
Chart.
2. The ULE/Replacement timeframe is whichever is greater of the two values.
Replacement timeframe is the time it will take to replace the tree in the same
environment like-for-like.
Tree Management Plan (TMP) Ref: JN0823
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.