Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Taj Conquest - MCU25/0118
From: "Taj Conquest" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 12:05:54 +1000
To: "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
Subject: Submission for Development Application MCU25/0118
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments
if the email is unexpected or unusual.
Submission Regarding Development Application MCU25/0118 (Variation
Submission)
To: Assessment Manager – Noosa Shire Council
Date: 22 November 2025
Re: MCU25/0118 – Coast2Bay Housing Group Proposal (25 Dwellings +
Community Room)
Site: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy QLD 4563 (Lot 2, Part of SP348613)
Submission Opposing the Proposed Development – Key Issues
I submit the following points in objection to the proposed development at 64 Lake
Macdonald Drive. This submission presents four primary concerns.
1. Site Purpose and Strategic Intent Not Upheld
The land involved was secured as an extension area for the Cooroy Cemetery and
has long been recognised by the community as reserved for this purpose.
Repurposing the land for a medium-density development diverges from the
established strategic intent for the area. The limited leftover space proposed for
cemetery expansion does not adequately address community needs, nor does it
align with the long-term planning direction expected for such community-purpose
land.
Relevant Noosa Plan 2020 Provisions:
•
Document Set ID: 24329338
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
Strategic Framework – Community Needs (Part 3):
Identifies and protects land required for ongoing community purposes,
including cemeteries.
•
Community Facilities Zone Code (Part 6.4):
Prioritises land for community-serving uses and discourages
incompatible development.
•
Overall Outcomes (6.4.2):
Emphasise safeguarding designated land for community infrastructure.
2. Development Intensity Out of Character With Surrounding Neighbourhood
The proposed density sits in stark contrast to the immediate environment, which
transitions from low-density residential into rural residential almost immediately. The
height, scale, and footprint of the proposed dwellings are inconsistent with the
current built form of Lake Macdonald Drive and Dianella Court. The introduction of
multi-storey buildings in an otherwise low-rise neighbourhood would create a visual
and amenity impact that is not compatible with the established local character.
Relevant Noosa Plan 2020 Provisions:
•
Low Density Residential Zone Code (6.3.2):
Supports detached dwellings and low-intensity built form that reflects
surrounding character.
•
Rural Residential Zone Code (6.3.3):
Reinforces larger-lot, rural-edge character incompatible with medium-
density development.
•
Document Set ID: 24329338
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 3
Cooroy & Hinterland Local Plan Code (7.2.5):
Requires development to maintain the existing character, scale, and
streetscape qualities of the locality.
3. Access Limitations and Traffic Safety Risks on Dianella Court
Dianella Court was designed as a quiet residential street intended to accommodate
a small number of households. Adding vehicle movements from potentially 30–40
additional cars—plus visitors, trades, support staff, and service vehicles—would
create traffic levels beyond the street’s design capability.
The applicant’s engineering report (Section 3.1) states that “there are no permanent
sight obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveway, nor the new subdivision road
intersection with existing Dianella Court (to the north east of the site). Therefore no
sight distances issues are present.” However, this assessment is incomplete, as it
does not address sight distances to the south.
Sight lines to the south along Dianella Court are severely restricted by the existing
dwelling at 2 Dianella Court, creating a dangerous blind zone for vehicles exiting
the proposed development road. This will significantly increase the safety risk for
current residents attempting to leave their homes, as approaching vehicles may not
be visible in time to avoid collisions.
Relevant Noosa Plan 2020 Provisions:
•
Transport & Parking Code (9.4.12):
o
PO1:
Requires safe and efficient access for vehicles entering and
leaving a site.
o
PO3:
Ensures development does not create unsafe conditions or
overload local streets.
Document Set ID: 24329338
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 4
o
PO7:
Access points must maintain adequate sight distances and avoid
safety hazards.
•
Schedule 6 – Planning Scheme Policy: Traffic:
Incorporates Austroads visibility and intersection-safety standards. The
location of the proposed access point raises further concerns regarding
visibility and safe manoeuvring, especially near the intersection, where
sight lines are already limited.
4. Insufficient Proximity to Essential Daily Services
The application suggests convenient access to essential services, but this is not
reflected in reality. The nearest full-line grocery stores require a significant walk that
involves crossing multiple roads, navigating a steep pedestrian bridge, and carrying
groceries over more than 1.6 km each way. Public transport access is also limited,
with the nearest bus stop located well beyond commonly accepted walkable
distances. For a development aimed at vulnerable or low-mobility residents, this
presents a major functional and social disadvantage.
Relevant Noosa Plan 2020 Provisions:
•
Liveable Communities & Housing Code (9.4.3):
o
PO14:
Requires reasonable walking access to daily needs and services.
o
PO5:
Housing for vulnerable or low-mobility groups must be located
where services are readily accessible.
Document Set ID: 24329338
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 5
•
Strategic Framework – Liveability (3.5):
Directs higher-density or supported housing toward areas near public
transport, centres, and essential services.
Conclusion
The proposal, in its current form, fails to align with the intended use of the land, is
inconsistent with surrounding neighbourhood character, presents traffic and safety
issues, and is poorly located with respect to essential services. For these reasons, I
request that Council recommend refusal of Development Application MCU25/0118.
Yours sincerely,
Taj Conquest
14 Dianella Court Cooroy
4563
Document Set ID: 24329338
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Used in these records
PM Submission - Taj Conquest - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 147 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.