2008-18366 SRA - Response with conditions (1) · MCU20/0074

                                                                                                 2008-18366 SRA




Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA’s decision are:
The development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of the
SDAP. Specifically, the development:
       does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road
       does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
        road works
       does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
        roads and the surrounding road network
       does not compromise the state’s ability to construct, or significantly increase the cost to construct
        state-controlled roads and future state-controlled roads
       does not compromise the state’s ability to maintain and operate state-controlled roads, or
        significantly increase the cost to maintain and operate state-controlled roads
       does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
        compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services
       avoids or mitigates significant adverse impacts resulting from environmental emissions generated by
        vehicles on the state-controlled road.

Material used in the assessment of the application:
       The development application material and submitted plans
       Planning Act 2016
       Planning Regulation 2017
       The SDAP (version 2.6), as published by SARA
       The Development Assessment Rules
       SARA DA Mapping system.




    State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                             Page 5 of 7