Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-13 General Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
Page 44 of 61
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
Greater private participation in protected areas Local government contributions to conservation
Since 2005, the Queensland Government program, Many local government authorities (LGAs) in Queensland
NatureAssist, has been the primary grants-based incentives own and manage areas of high conservation value. The
scheme for the Nature Refuges Program and has played Queensland Government would like to work more closely
an important role in increasing the size and quality of with local government to ensure appropriate land is protected
the protected area system. To date, incentives have been under the Nature Conservation Act and included in the
directed to recruiting new nature refuges or extensions to National Reserve System.
existing nature refuges; not to their ongoing management. Several LGAs are interested in formally delivering protected
While the NatureAssist program is highly efficient at recruiting area outcomes on private land utilising nature refuges. The
nature refuges, the current range of incentives could be Queensland Government has trialled a co-delivery model
expanded to attract greater participation from private for nature refuges with some LGAs. This model has the
landholders in protected areas and to better support those capacity to be expanded to other local government areas.
already managing their land for conservation outcomes. Consideration could also be given to ways in which LGAs
The current support offered to nature refuge landholders, could be given the capacity to more directly deliver nature
in the form of periodic contact and visits by Nature Refuges refuges. This could be a potentially cheaper and more
Program staff, is not considered adequate by many nature effective alternative to Land Act covenants that are ;
refuge landholders. A greater level of assistance, either commonly used to deliver local Voluntary Conservation
monetary or in another form, would assist landholders Agreement programs.
with the ongoing management of their nature refuges. As part of the strategy development, targeted consultation
This assistance would also act as an incentive for other will take place with the Local Government Association
landholders to participate in private protected areas. of Queensland and interested LGAs to discuss mutually
Offering or facilitating access to alternative income streams beneficial private protected area opportunities.
may also encourage landholders to refrain from adverse
management decisions. Alternative income streams could ACTION PROPOSED
be realised via, for example, environmental stewardship . .
. : . A12. Explore options with local government for
programs (which recognise the public benefits from ing their significant tion reserv
sustainable land management); carbon abatement programs; protecting t er signincant conservation reserves
oe . in Queensland’s protected area system
or biodiversity offsets schemes.
The Queensland Government is proposing to explore
options for reducing government taxes and charges and
other disincentives for private landholders to participate in
conservation.
ACTIONS PROPOSED
A9. Consider alternative and innovative ways to
deliver the NatureAssist incentives scheme to
encourage the establishment, and assist in the
ongoing management, of private protected areas
A10. Explore and facilitate uptake of alternative income
streams such as carbon schemes, stewardship
approaches and offsets schemes on private
protected areas
Ai1. Investigate options to reduce government
charges and other disincentives for private
protected area owners
WHAT DO YOU THINK? ?
Q6. Can you suggest what additional support would assist landholders to meet their operational e
and maintenance costs of nature refuges?
Q7. What incentives would encourage you to become a nature refuge landholder (if your property had
the appropriate conservation values)?
Q8. Are there any factors that you think discourage uptake of private protected areas?
Draft Queensland Protected Area Strategy | 13
Page 44 of 61See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.