Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-13 General Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
Page 46 of 61
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
WHAT DO YOU THINK? 8 .
Q9. Are there other avenues to maintain the current and expanded parks estate? _
Q10. Do you support user fees where the fees would contribute to management costs? Lr aie
Q11. Should Queensland consider a more contemporary approach to visitor use-related fees, similar to other states,
to provide an improved contribution to park management?
Q12. Are you supportive of any of the strategies the Queensland Government is proposing to explore in relation to
providing partnership arrangements and additional revenue to assist with managing national parks across
Queensland (see Options for future management and enjoyment on page 14)?
If so, please provide comment on any of these strategies.
« Can you suggest any other strategies that should also be explored?
Q13. How would you encourage partnerships, volunteers, sponsorship and other promotional activities associated
with national parks?
<i ~<a
,..
ae
'
)
ra
ik
' ’
J
7 «
Fe - om Cartarvgn’ National Park
— gePhote=© Roberf Ashdown; Queenstfand Government
- > pode:
#DtaftQueensland-Protéected Ateanstrategy «| 15
“" -
. Te ies ae
Page 46 of 61See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.