Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-13 General Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
Page 49 of 61
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 FEBRUARY 2017
4. Shaping the future of Queensland’s protected area system
* 9
Public protected areas such as national parks and There are several factors that need to be considered when
conservation parks currently form 70% of Queensland’s applying a medium-term target to growing Queensland’s
protected area system, with privately-owned nature protected area system. The ratio of public to private protected
refuges making up the remaining 30% of protected areas. areas will need to be considered, as will the relative State
Incentive schemes, such as the Queensland Government- funding required to grow both the private and public
funded NatureAssist program, have generated increased components of the protected area system. The government
participation in protected areas by the private sector, with will also need to decide what proportion of the overall
nature refuges comprising the majority of the increase in the protected area budget to allocate to the proposed Special
protected area system over the last 10 years. Wildlife Reserve type of private protected area, compared
The Queensland Government’s long-term target to grow with nature refuges and public protected areas.
the protected area system in line with the United Nations The various protected area types, including the proposed
Convention on Biological Diversity target, is ambitious and Special Wildlife Reserve, have differing costs and suitability
will be challenging to achieve. The setting of a medium-term for implementation, differing levels of protection and use,
target, to achieve a comprehensive, adequate, representative and differing degrees of public benefit, particularly relating
and climate resilient protected area system, would assist to public access.
in focussing efforts over a set period of time. This would All of these factors need to be considered when thinking
allow for a more strategic approach to investment in about the desired make-up of the protected area system.
conservation opportunities.
ACTION PROPOSED
A19. Develop a medium-term target for working towards a 17% terrestrial protected area coverage, including relative
contributions of private and public areas
WHAT DO YOU THINK? é
Q19. The current ratio of public protected area coverage to private protected area coverage in the state is
70:30. Do you think this is appropriate? If not, what sort of ratio should we have, and why?
yy
SN oN ; a
‘ . i '
\ | pm t ' :
~ Th » . , .
x na : |
_——_ a ,s . ay ¥ ~ i. b ae
an eee “ag "
en a ee ~~ * el 2 _
: Ss - = ~~ ms ~~ a, ws
a2) iS ws E BON eh nee ae a
4 Pe sel. = ; FB j Sa eee eg oN — a NE SN ies
hes Na: Z Be YN ep es Ss one
-_ . ite eee ee
ee eee CS Eee
————— Bas eas tn SE ee ee eee Jae See PETES
Brolgas, North Queensland _ = SS er See Ver ee ard ees Sa
_ Photo: © Queensland Government™ 3 ss Aa <s— Fa Bsn ie Segess
18 |
Page 49 of 61See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.