Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-02-13 General Committee Meeting Agenda

of 61

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (14.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                       13 FEBRUARY 2017


Recurrent Expenditure (YTD Benchmark 58%)

Operating expenditure is currently 55% of the full year budget forecast. Detailed commentary for
each expenditure category appears below:

 Employee Costs – Actuals of $16.0m against the YTD budget of $16.4m and equates to 56%
   of the full year budget. This is represented by an under-expenditure of the training allocation
   ($119k), a rebate for Work Cover premiums ($37k), and recovery from labour allocations to
   capital projects exceeding budget.
 Materials and Services – $20.8m (51% of the full year budget) has been expended compared
   to the YTD budget of $21.6m. Year to date variances primarily relate to contract services
   budgets, specifically under expenditure in electricity costs ($79k); insurance costs ($24k);
   Waste operations ($135k); ICT Operations ($116k); Fleet & Plant operations ($64k); Library
   Services ($47k); and Property & Facilities ($70k). Civil Works is below budget ($369k); and
   Planning costs are currently ahead of budget by $234k due to ongoing appeal defence costs.
   Levy related expenses also shows under-expenditure of $72k against YTD budget forecasts.
   All significant variances will be investigated for possible adjustment with the current budget
   review.
 Finance Costs – bank merchant fees ($16k) and interest on loans ($35k) are currently below
   the YTD budget.
 Depreciation expenses – actual depreciation exceeds the YTD budget by $323k. A revised
   forecast will be done as part of the current budget review to account for a higher than
   anticipated impact of asset revaluations undertaken as at 30 June 2016.
 Other Expenses – in accordance with YTD budget.

Figure 3: Recurrent Expenditure Position by Type
 $25

                                                      YTD Budget ($m)
 $20
                                                      YTD Actual ($m)
 $15


 $10


  $5


  $0
                         Materials




                                      Finance Costs




                                                                Depreciation
            Employees




                                                                               Other




Capital Revenue

YTD capital revenue of $3.7m received includes $2.4m of cash contributions from developers,
together with $1.3m received as grant funding towards capital projects, including $200k (TIDS);
$153k (Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery); $303k (Rufous Street Project); $75k (Natural
Disaster Resilience Program – Flood studies and flood gauges); $275k (Bus Shelter Disability
Upgrade program); $288k (Cycle Network Program); and $11k Road Safety Grant. Adjustments
will be made as part of the budget review currently underway to account for annual trend and
grant revenue not originally included in the budget.

                                                                                           Page 56 of 61
Log in to download the original file

2017-02-13 General Committee Meeting Agenda(PDF, 14MB).pdf · 14.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.