Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

003 ECM_22828362_v1_Reference Document - OPW23 0189 · OPW26/0094

of 75

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

                                                                                                                                    ADG Consulting Pty Ltd



                                                        Parameter                                                           Criteria

                               Totals metals (µg/L)
                               Aluminium                                                                             No ANZG criteria / 2003

                               Iron                                                                                  No ANZG criteria / 3003

                              Table notes:
                              1. DES(2022). Noosa River environmental values and water quality objectives (canal).
                              2. ANZG (2018). Supersedes ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) ‐ Marine water trigger values for 95% species protection.
                              3. Criteria subject to expected condition in Development Application (DA) notice by Noosa Shire Council.
                              * = Insufficient data to derive a reliable trigger value. Low reliability value adopted (refer ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Section
                              8.3.7.

                              Although ADG has not been provided a copy of the DA notice and conditions for the proposed
                              development, based on previous dewatering projects in the Sunshine/Noosa Coast Region it is expected
                              that total iron and aluminium concentrations as listed in Table 3 (above) are likely to be conditioned by
                              Noosa Shire Council for compliance. It should be noted, that these concentrations are considered to be
                              onerous with respect to the risk‐based (worst‐case) bioavailable trigger value criteria contained in ANZG
                              2018 & ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) for marine water (moderately disturbed) 95% species protection, and
                              are likely to be difficult to achieve given the groundwater conditions encountered in the locality on
                              previous dewatering projects on the Sunshine/Noosa Coast.

                              Prior to discharge to the stormwater system or any waterway, discharges are to be tested to meet the
                              requirements of the ANZG 2018 & ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water
                              Quality. There is currently no chemical toxicant trigger value criteria available for total or dissolved (i.e.
                              bioavailable) concentrations of aluminium or iron for marine or estuarine waters under the Australian
                              and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality Guidelines (ANZG 2018 &
                              ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000 – i.e. ANZECC Guidelines) or the Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational
                              Waters (NHMRC 2008), with regards to managing environmental impacts to the waterway.

                              In addition, Section 5 (Guidelines for recreational water quality and aesthetics) of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ
                              (2000) Guidelines (per section 5.2 thereof) was superseded by the Guidelines for Managing Risks in
                              Recreational Water in 2008 (NHMRC, 2008). Therefore, a reference to the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)
                              Guidelines is by association and extension a reference to the current 2008 NHMRC Guidelines. The 2008
                              NHMRC Guidelines contain no criteria for aluminium, and only includes an aesthetic criterion for iron –
                              noting this is an aesthetic criterion derived from the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines on the basis of
                              ingesting 2L of the recreational water solution per day. ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Section 5.2.3.3, notes
                              that as a general guideline, under Toxic Chemicals, ‘Higher concentrations of toxicants may be tolerated
                              occasionally if it assumed that no person will ingest more than a maximum of 100 mL water during a
                              normal swimming session (NHMRC 1990) compared with 2L/d for potable water’, and Section 3.1.1.3,
                              under Risk based approach of the guidelines, ‘The guideline trigger values are based on bioavailable
                              concentrations, and hence are relatively conservative when compared with total concentrations in the
                              field, so the use of the decision frameworks will increase guideline concentrations in most cases’.
                              Therefore, any chemical toxicant trigger values would require reassessment and likely increase upwards
                              of any ANZG 2018 &/or ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Guideline trigger values due to the slightly to
                              moderately disturbed nature (and thereby reduced sensitivity) of the receiving waters.

                              In conditioning more onerous criteria, rather than the available marine chemical toxicant trigger value
                              criteria contained within the ANZG/ANZECC Guidelines, an unachievable constraint may be placed on the
                              development. This DMP has allowed for contingency measures to be incorporated into the treatment
                              and discharge system if required, including silt curtains to be installed within the receiving waterway
                              surrounding the discharge location, or further onsite treatment measures such as filtration, to prevent
                              and/or minimise as far as reasonably practicable the potential for release of suspended solid loads into
                              the broader receiving waterway.




                        ADG1580.23 Dewatering Management Plan_Rev0_28.09.23                                                                                  Page 8




Document Set ID: 22828362
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/02/2024

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.5 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

003 ECM_22828362_v1_Reference Document - OPW23 0189.pdf · 5.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.