Original source · versioned page text
2022-12-12 General Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (11.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 DECEMBER 2022
Figure 3 – Latest satellite imagery of the site
During the course of the appeal, Council’s solicitor advised that Council’s prospects are not strong
and that the appeal would likely be allowed, if the matter went to a hearing. Council’s planning
solicitor noted the following the following factors may hinder Council's prospects in the appeal:
• The State does not consider the existing jetty as constructed creates a safety hazard;
• The time between the construction of the jetty and compliance action being taken (being
around 27 years);
• The assertion that the non-compliant jetty was inspected post construction and approved by
Council -27 years ago;
• The fact that both properties are no longer owned by the people who constructed the jetty;
It has also been asserted by the applicant’s planning solicitor that:
1. in issuing its final inspection approval of the enlarged jetty, Council approved the initial
application for the jetty (as varied);
2. therefore the approval has been completed and there is no non-compliance to be actioned.
Council’s planning solicitor further advises the appeal also presents an opportunity that would be
difficult to achieve for Council if it commenced enforcement proceedings. Especially given the
discretionary factors that would be considered by the Court (in enforcement proceedings) would
probably weigh in favour of the landowner.
Ultimately it would be a waste of time and resources if enforcement proceedings were pursued and
the Court was satisfied that while a development offence had been committed, the Court refused
to make any orders in relation to the offence.
It is therefore recommended that the appeal be settled.
Previous Council Consideration
Not applicable.
Finance & Risks
Should the appeal not be settled by Council, there will be further costs for Council in proceeding to
trial.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Thynne Macartney – Tim Quirk
Page 25 of 69
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.