Council archive · source document
Development Application - Part 2 of 2 - Report & Plans · OPW11/0116
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (13.6 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
The movement of the downstream closure substantially reduces the effective footprint of the works and its impact of the
works on the river processes without reducing the benefits provided to critical areas. The raising of the shoreward end of the
upstream closure to form a partial training wall also provided noticeable benefit to the upstream areas.
(♦ .r150
(♦ - -150
-100
-090
-070
(♦ `.0 -060
40 -0SO
yt -040
IC-035
tl♦ ' •030
tl♦ • 0 25
tl♦ - 0 20
t^ .015
II• -010
t^ -005
i ,H.v000
I I.fined Valun
urreit s{.eed Im++l
(♦ .*1 50
:-150
-080
•070
.060
-050
M -040
•035
® -030
t^ -025
020
Ittln - 0 15
tl♦ 0 10
f♦ 0 05
tl• , 000
Figure 33: Results of MIKE21HD model [ebb & flood tide] for Option D3 [training wall with upstream & downstream
closure]
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application - Part 2 of 2 - Report & PlansRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 13.6 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.