Council archive · source document
Development Application - Part 2 of 2 - Report & Plans · OPW11/0116
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (13.6 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Preliminary estimates have been prepared [Table 3 - Table 6].
Table 3: Preliminary cost estimate for training wall [rock brouqht in by truck option
Qty Rate Amount
ex-GS
Establishment $100,000
Clearing, temporary access track & revegetation $200,000
Approval fees associated with clearing
Excavation 3.600 m2 $12 $45,000
Supply & placement of geotextile 600R 2.000m2 $10 $20,000
Supply of rock 3,100 m3 $60 $185,000
Delivery and placement of rock 3,100 m3 $120 $375,000
Project management 5% $45,000
TOTAL $970,000+
Table 4: Preliminary cost estimate for trainin wall [rock brou ht in b bar e o tion
Qty Rate Amount
ex-GS
Establishment $100,000
Excavation 3,600 m2 $12 $45,000
Supply & placement of geotextile 600R 2,000 m2 $10 $20,000
Supply of rock 2,700 m3 S60 $160,000
Delivery and placement of rock are 2,700 m3 $160 $435.000
Project management 5% $40,000
TOTAL $800,000
Table 5: Preliminary cost estimate for traininq wall [sand-filled qeotextile container option
Qty Rate Amount
]ex-GST]
Establishment $100,000
Additional excavation 400 m3 $12 $5,000
Supply mega-containers [vandal resistant geotextile] 17 $11,620 $198,000
Excavate, place and fill mega-containers 17 $6,000 $102,000
Project management 5% $20,000
TOTAL $407,000
Table 6: Preliminary cost estimate for traininq wall [sand-filled qeotextile container with rock armour option
Qty Rate Amount
ex-GS
Establishment $150,000
Additional excavation 400 m2 $12 $5,000
Supply mega-containers [vandal resistant geotextile] 17 $11,620 $198,000
Excavate, place and fill mega-containers 17 $6,000 $102,000
Supply of rock 1400 m3 $60 $85,000
Delivery and placement of rock are 1400 m3 $160 $225,000
Project management 5% S40,000
TOTAL $805,000
While it was originally preferred to construct using sand-filled mega-containers in the first instance and subsequently armour
with rock due to concerns regarding the potential for damage. During stakeholder consultation, it became evident that there
were concerns regarding the use of rock, the difficulty of removal and the visual impact. At this stage, the preferred option is
the sand-filled geotextile container training wall, although if maintenance becomes an ongoing issue, further consideration
may be given to rock armouring.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application - Part 2 of 2 - Report & PlansRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 13.6 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.