Original source · versioned page text
Minor_Change_Req
with better designed access to each room and a reduced extent of earthworks and retaining required to establish the foundations for the building. The changes proposed result in an improved outcome for the site and adjoining premises with a smaller building footprint and greater mitigation of landslide hazard. 2. Proposed Changes to Approved Plans It is requested to make a Minor Change to the approved plans to accommodate revised built form, whilst maintaining the predominant structure and site layout of the approved development. Please refer to the Revised Building Design Plans prepared by Clare Design in Attachment 2. As illustrated in Attachment 2, the proposal maintains the key components of the approved built form, which includes a contemporary architectural design with a combination of flat and skillion roof forms, three (3) distinct building levels and a stepped structure that gives the appearance of a single storey Dwelling to the street. To best illustrate the key differences in the design, a comparative building footprint plan has been prepared and is available as drawing DA-15 in Attachment 2. This is also provided in Figure 1 below for ease of reference. Figure 1 Building footprint comparative analysis (Clare Design 2022) As illustrated above, the overall footprint of the development has been reduced, with a more compact structure proposed that sits centrally within the allotment to reduce the visual impact of the built form when viewed externally. Further, the site layout provides for a more efficient use of the lot and creates a more open interface with the public walkway to the north by orientating the private open space areas and structural voids to face this boundary. In accordance with Section 81(4) (Assessing Change Application for Minor Changes) of the Planning Act 2016, Council must consider the change application against the planning scheme that was in effect when the development application sought to be changed was properly made, which is the Noosa Plan 2006. Table 1 below provides a comparative analysis of the key development parameters and areas of compliance achieved by both the approved and proposed outcome when assessed against the Detached House Code of the Noosa Plan 2006. Our ref: 220202 Page 2 of 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.