Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object- Velecha Lawrey

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

,------ -------



         Code Objective                       Developer's      Assessment                 Objectors'     Assessment

         road system                                                                      proposed access and egress point
                                                                                          does impact adversely on the safety
                                                                                          and operation      of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                                          Road.

         014 Provision is made for            014 Complies                                Does not Comply
         pedestrian and vehicular             Can comply via condition                    The Applicants response is
         queues at conflict points;           where applicable.                           inconsistent     and vague. The
                                                                                          Development       will significantly       affect
                                                                                          traffic on the Eumundi-Noosa               Road,
                                                                                          the roundabout       outside the School
                                                                                          and pedestrian children on the
                                                                                          footpath     entrance in the event of
                                                                                          queuing to access the proposed
                                                                                          Development.       The Applicant has
                                                                                          provided no objective analysis of the
                                                                                          likely queuing frequency or extent.
                                                                                          The Applicant's     response      is indicative
                                                                                          of the fact that the Applicant has not
                                                                                          conducted the required analysis and
                                                                                          expects the Assessment Manager to
                                                                                          determine      what is appropriate,         which
                                                                                          is unacceptable     in the already
                                                                                          challenging circumstances.

         017 Car parking areas are            017 Complies                                Does not Comply
         landscaped ...                       Car parking areas have been                 Cannot be compliant          as they do not
                                              suitably landscaped.                        meet the requirements          of the
                                                                                          Landscaping Code Objective 028.


        The Application     does not comply        in the areas outlined     above and has completely                failed to address
        adequately     the potential   impacts on the adjoining         School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning Report the
        Applicant    makes unfounded,      unqualified    and unsupported        opinion      as to the potential       impacts on the
        adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive                nor soundly validated for example:


          Applicants    Response / Assertion                        Objectors'    Response

           1.   The proposed      petrol   store    building   is   This is a statement        of fact without       justification     as to
                located more than 10m form the school               its relevance.
                boundary
                                                                    10m is in effect too close to the School boundary to
                                                                    ensure   the     safety     of   the    children     attending        the
                                                                    School. We have demonstrated                  elsewhere          in this
                                                                    document       that    international       and     Australian       best




                                                                                                                                              23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.3 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object- Velecha Lawrey.pdf · 10.3 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.